Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: Doug Jacobs <djacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:46:59 -0000
paulmd@xxxxxxx <paulmd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think perhaps windows 2k and XP aren't broken enough. The stability
of win2k and XP compared with 9x anything was a pretty compelling
reason to upgrade. Vista's selling point was supposed to be virus
proofing the PC at last (something OsX did for the Mac), but then
several antivirus vendors said that a large percentage of viruses will
still run on vista. And then OneCare gets the only failing grade of
17antivirus programs tested.... (missed 20% of viruses it was tested
against! egad!)
Well, Vista does try to take some steps towards limiting/prventing viruses
from running...although that's not the same as having a good AV program
running.
Still, Vista is based on XP/Win2k, so it's going to have the same
vulnerabilities.
--
Win cash and giftcards just for clicking your mouse!
http://www.netwinner.com/?signupCode=amuro98
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: Tom Scales
- Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- References:
- PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: Nota Clu
- Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: RnR
- Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: Ben Myers
- Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- From: paulmd@xxxxxxx
- PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Acronis True Image 10 Home
- Next by Date: Re: Can I completely copy one hd to another?
- Previous by thread: Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- Next by thread: Re: PC World Dings Vista's Performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading