Re: Mind Bender: Cascading (or Chained) Remote Desktops

Again, I could be mis-understanding (been a long weekend), but he suggests
going from his 630m to the E1505 to the E510 back to the 630m. The
connection to the 630m would disconnect his original session (his "live"
one).

That's the way I read it, anyway, when reading about his "gap in the
space-time continuum".

Clint

"Tom Scales" <tjscales@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rEY4g.4109$9o4.2196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Think clients, not servers. He wants to have clients to multiple machines
at the same time
"Clint" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xNX4g.2520$zn1.563@xxxxxxxxxxx
I was under the impression that with XP, you can only have one session
"active". If someone else tries to remote in, they can kick off the
current user, but they can't both be in. I could very well be mistaken on
that, though. On Server 2000/2003, that wouldn't be an issue.

Clint

"Tom Scales" <tjscales@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:chI4g.4011$d_4.3936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"journey" <jrny_of_life@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lko5529kpljtvg95fb9j7n5rcfvfpbhllo@xxxxxxxxxx
I am sitting here in my recliner with my 630m connected to my E1505
through remote desktop, and my E1505 connected to my E510 through
remote desktop.

On any of the computers I can access all of the network drives, and
the C drives of the other computers.

Wow ......

I haven't tried to connect the E510 (which I am accessing through the
E1505 (which I am accessing through the 630m)) back around to the 630m
lol. I am worried that it might cause a gap in the space-time
continuum ..... or that I might be stuck in some kind of an
infinite-reality loop ...

Journey

Why do the double jump? Why not just have two sessions on the 630m? I
run multiple sessions all the time

Tom
typing this on his I6000 using OE on his GX260







.