Re: dimension 8100 rdram problem
- From: "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:38:53 GMT
"yanni" <ian.gaither@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127163927.105456.16790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hi,
>
> I recently bought a dimension 8100 loaded with
> 2 x 256meg (kingston ktd-dm800..don't know whether it is ecc or not)
> and
> 2 x 64meg (samsung 800-45 ecc)
>
> This should show 640, but only 384 is showing. I guess this suggests
> that 1 of the 256 is dead? Is there any way of knowing which one or
> whether upgrading my bios would make a difference?
>
>
> Strangely, when I remove either both 256 or both 64, the pc will not
> boot...screen remains black after powering on.
>
> Thanks for your help...
>
I'd bet that Kingston used markings that reflected the TOTAL for the pair,
since they are only useable as pairs. That would mean you have 2x128 + 2x64
= 384. I would be shocked if the machine would work at all if ONE of a pair
of modules was dead. Also, the machine will not boot at all if any of the
sockets are empty. As mentioned, there was a special dummy module that had
to be installed (again in pairs) if any sockets were empty. RDram was a bad
idea that didn't last.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dimension 8100 rdram problem
- From: Ben Myers
- Re: dimension 8100 rdram problem
- References:
- dimension 8100 rdram problem
- From: yanni
- dimension 8100 rdram problem
- Prev by Date: Re: change pentium 4 processors
- Next by Date: looking for motherboard C840
- Previous by thread: Re: dimension 8100 rdram problem
- Next by thread: Re: dimension 8100 rdram problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading