Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- From: "Robert R Kircher, Jr." <rrkircher@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:48:40 -0400
"Christopher Muto" <muto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VWOPe.74$LK.66@xxxxxxxxxxx
>i wonder if there was also a modem in the system and that was perhaps the
>source of the conflict. com1/3 and 2/4 each share a single irq and can not
>be in use at the same time (ie com3 can't be used if com1 is in use). some
>modem driver software (if installed) have monitor utilities that keep the
>modem port open and therefore disable the coresponding com port that shares
>its irq.
>
> i have found that usb to serial port converters work quite reliably. i
> had to use many of them to enable legacy free laptops (no serial ports) to
> syncronize with the older generation blackberries, palms, and celleur
> phones. the belkin made ones never failed.
>
No modem... and no indication of any IRQ conflict. interesting thing
about the USP-Serial adapter is that I couldn't get the device to work with
the adapter set to COM 2 or 3 but it worked fine at COM 1.
--
Rob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- From: Christopher Muto
- Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- References:
- Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- From: Robert R Kircher, Jr.
- Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- From: Christopher Muto
- Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- Prev by Date: Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- Next by Date: Dimension 2400 Memory Upgrade with 512MB
- Previous by thread: Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- Next by thread: Re: Optiplex 170L - Non standard COM port?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|