has anyone else seen this?
- From: "readandpostrosie" <readandpost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:08:11 GMT
Nicotine Up Sharply In Many Cigarettes
Some Brands More Than 30% Stronger
By David BrownWashington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 31, 2006; Page A01
The amount of nicotine in most cigarettes rose an average of almost 10
percent from 1998 to 2004, with brands most popular with young people and
minorities registering the biggest increases and highest nicotine content,
according to a new study.
Nicotine is highly addictive, and while no one has studied the effect of the
increases on smokers, the higher levels theoretically could make new smokers
more easily addicted and make it harder for established smokers to quit.
The trend was discovered by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health,
which requires that tobacco companies measure the nicotine content of
cigarettes each year and report the results.
As measured using a method that mimics actual smoking, the nicotine
delivered per cigarette -- the "yield" -- rose 9.9 percent from 1998 to
2004 -- from 1.72 milligrams to 1.89. The total nicotine content increased
an average of 16.6 percent in that period, and the amount of nicotine per
gram of tobacco increased 11.3 percent.
The study, reported by the Boston Globe, found that 92 of 116 brands tested
had higher nicotine yields in 2004 than in 1998, and 52 had increases of
more than 10 percent.
Boxes of Doral lights, a low-tar brand made by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.,
had the biggest increase in yield, 36 percent. Some of this may have been
the result of an increase in the total amount of tobacco put in that brand's
cigarettes, one expert said.
The nicotine in Marlboro products, preferred by two-thirds of high school
smokers, increased 12 percent. Kool lights increased 30 percent. Two-thirds
of African American smokers use menthol brands.
Not only did most brands have more nicotine in 2004, the number of brands
with very high nicotine yields also rose.
In 1998, Newport 100s and unfiltered Camels were tied for highest nicotine
yield at 2.9 milligrams. In 2004, Newport had risen to 3.2 milligrams, and
five brands measured 3 milligrams or higher.
"The reports are stunning," said Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign
for Tobacco-Free Kids. "What's critical is the consistency of the increase,
which leads to the conclusion that it has to have been conscious and
deliberate."
"People need to be aware of this," said Sally Fogerty, Massachusetts's
associate commissioner for community health. "If a person is trying to quit
and is having a hard time, it's not just them. There is an increasing
percentage of nicotine that they are ingesting, and that may make it more
difficult."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also focused on the potential
behavioral consequences of the finding.
"We know nicotine is addictive, so if the amount of nicotine in cigarettes
is increasing, it could make it even harder for the 70 percent of smokers
who want to quit and the more than 40 percent who try to quit every year,"
Corinne Husten, acting director of the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health,
said in an e-mail message.
No spokesman for a tobacco company would speak on the record about the
Massachusetts findings yesterday.
One company official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that
while the nicotine content measured by smoking machines can vary by up to 6
percent between individual cigarettes of the same brand, "we don't know"
whether an entire brand's production could differ that much from year to
year.
But in a 1,653-page opinion released two weeks ago in a landmark suit
against the major tobacco companies by the federal government and several
anti-smoking organizations, the judge found that cigarette makers adjusted
nicotine levels with great care.
"Using the knowledge produced by that research, defendants have designed
their cigarettes to precisely control nicotine delivery levels and provide
doses of nicotine sufficient to create and sustain addiction," wrote U.S.
District Judge Gladys Kessler.
The ruling enjoined the companies from misinforming the public about
tobacco's hazards. The companies are uncertain what that means and cited the
ruling yesterday as the chief reason for their silence. Reynolds and
Lorillard Tobacco Co. have also temporarily shut down their Web sites.
Reginald V. Fant, a clinical pharmacologist and nicotine expert at Pinney
Associates, a consulting firm in Bethesda, said increasing nicotine content
by 10 percent "would not be expected" to change how much a person smokes but
could affect his ability to quit.
"We know that physiologically the changes in the nicotine receptors in the
brain are related to the amount of nicotine consumed," he said.
Neal Benowitz, a physician and pharmacologist at the University of
California at San Francisco, said, "I don't think we know what the
consequences are for the population in terms of addictive behavior and how
hard it is for people to quit."
Myers said the Massachusetts findings are evidence that tobacco products
should be more strictly regulated.
"The only way the companies were able to secretly increase nicotine levels
without anyone knowing about it is because no federal agency regulates
tobacco products," he said.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: has anyone else seen this?
- From: ~Echo~
- Re: has anyone else seen this?
- Prev by Date: Re: meter flash...
- Next by Date: Re: Fired My BOL
- Previous by thread: thinking of zyban
- Next by thread: Re: has anyone else seen this?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
