Re: stinky hands
- From: "Richard" <rvardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:05:18 GMT
i honestly don't have a clue as to what's going on and try hard not to
second guess people. i would have expected a HA HA or LOL in there somewhere
though.
i just tried to analyse the wording and seek clarification from anyone who
chose to respond as Steveb so kindly did. it was the first time that i had
paid any attention to it.
i was surprised at Rob's opening statement with the use of the word 'blatant
and wondered why.
oh well...............
"Kimberly" <goldenrulzNOJUNK@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44rp9rF3i4ouU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think Rob was just joking with robbbb. Of course I've been wrong
before -
once or twice. ;-)
Kimberly
"Richard" <rvardy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:x_1Gf.93892$mu.43078@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| hi Steve
|
| first time I've come across 'smokeaway'. from the few responses i read
from
| one of the sites I'm not at all surprised about the 'lively debate' you
| refer to.
|
| richard
|
|
|
| "steveb" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:o99hu19leg9bivf8v345kqabeshu5gnbr7@xxxxxxxxxx
| > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:32:25 GMT, "Richard" <rvardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>doesn't this refer to someone who is posting for commercial purposes?
| >
| > Yes.
| >
| > It's a little broader, but not much ..... if you post a link to
| > *Smokeaway*, you are likely to be criticized. This is esp. true if you
| > suddenly appear from nowhere and post.
| >
| > OTOH, if you are a regular contributor, who has used *Smokeaway* (for
| > example) and found it worked for you, then you won't be flamed for
| > saying so. However, in the case of that particular product, expect a
| > lively debate.
| >
| > The policy, however it is written, simply seeks to stop commercial
| > posting .... no more, no less.
| >
| > --
| > steveb
| >
| > *Nothing worth having comes without some kind of fight--
| > Got to kick at the darkness `til it bleeds daylight*
|
|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: stinky hands
- From: robbb
- Re: stinky hands
- From: steveb
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Kimberly
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Billy Bob F.
- Re: stinky hands
- References:
- stinky hands
- From: Wendy
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Richard
- Re: stinky hands
- From: robbb
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Billy Bob F.
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Richard
- Re: stinky hands
- From: steveb
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Richard
- Re: stinky hands
- From: Kimberly
- stinky hands
- Prev by Date: Re: GX! Ping!
- Next by Date: Re: GX! Ping!
- Previous by thread: Re: stinky hands
- Next by thread: Re: stinky hands
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|