Re: OT: Pre-Conceptual Science

In article <1138475875.497549.198300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Sylv" <Sylv772003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tick;
>
> Good one!
>
> I don't remember what the logical fallacy is called, but starting with
> a conclusion is NOT science!
>
> Sylvia

Begging the Question, or circular reasoning/argument, IIRC.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Pre-Conceptual Science
    ... >>I don't remember what the logical fallacy is called, ... >>a conclusion is NOT science! ...
    (alt.support.mult-sclerosis)
  • Re: OT: Pre-Conceptual Science
    ... > John Husvar wrote: ... >>>I don't remember what the logical fallacy is called, ... >>>a conclusion is NOT science! ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.support.mult-sclerosis)
  • Re: OT: Pre-Conceptual Science
    ... John Husvar wrote: ... >> Tick; ... >> I don't remember what the logical fallacy is called, ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.support.mult-sclerosis)
  • Re: 51 Scientific Facts Disproving the Bible
    ... Good point on the logical fallacy but I'll post this link anyway. ... don't need science to disprove the Bible. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: Pre-Conceptual Science
    ... I don't remember what the logical fallacy is called, ... a conclusion is NOT science! ... Sylvia ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.support.mult-sclerosis)