Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: "Ozgirl" <are_we_there_yet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:32:32 +1000
"Susan" <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:9n6k0tFrtrU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x-no-archive: yes
On 1/11/2012 6:17 PM, hemyd wrote:
That is something I have never worked out -<why> Why would a (hopefully)
otherwise intelligent person try to provoke anger amongst people.
We should just not go there. Just a stinking can of worms.
Susan
Well considering the latest hoohah was started by you with an inflammatory remark about Ozgirl wants to kill your cat I find it ironic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: outsider
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: hemyd
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- References:
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: Susan
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: hemyd
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- From: Susan
- Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping MI
- Next by Date: Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- Previous by thread: Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- Next by thread: Re: For one who shall remain nameless.....
- Index(es):