Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Susan <susan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:27:19 -0400
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/11/2011 2:44 AM, Chris Malcolm wrote:
Many scientific controversies involve dispute about what is and is not
a fact. Most scientific revolutions involve overturning things which
were previously accepted as indisputable facts. Newton's ideas about
time, space, mass and energy were for a long time considered not only
to be indisputable fact but to be pradigmatic examples of
scientifically indisputable fact.
Until Einstein successfully disputed them.
"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research."
-Albert Einstein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: outsider
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- References:
- Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Susan
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Kurt
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Janet
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Janet
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Ozgirl
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Janet
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Susan
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Julie Bove
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Wes Groleau
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Ozgirl
- Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- Prev by Date: Re: Systolic BP target in diabetes: 130-135 mm Hg is usually optimal, says analysis
- Next by Date: EHEC : Take a photo of each meal when there is some Outbreak
- Previous by thread: Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- Next by thread: Re: Scientific American on epidemic of false claims
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|