Re: "Food" for thought
- From: "Cheri" <cherig3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:12:15 -0800
"Janet" <boxhill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:8qf4rrF58dU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Budd Cochran wrote:No intention to "go against the grain", just an interesting article
that supports my personal results with my moderate carb, moderate
portion, and all-the-activity-I-can-get-in-per-day lifestyle.
Btw, (and this'll really tick them off) my BG average for the last
two weeks is the equivalent of a 5.2 A1c, the two previous weeks: 5.5
No wonder I've dropped another 5 pounds over the last 3 months.
Why on earth would that tick anyone off? I'm happy for you.
It would never occur to me to think that you would be "ticked off" because I lost weight and achieved good BGs on a lower carb regime than your body needs.
In my view it isn't a competition. There aren't "sides." But YMMV.
It makes no sense to me either. I'm happy for ANYONE that has good control, however it's achieved.
Cheri
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Food" for thought
- From: Ricavito
- Re: "Food" for thought
- References:
- "Food" for thought
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: "Food" for thought
- From: Janet
- Re: "Food" for thought
- From: Kurt
- Re: "Food" for thought
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: "Food" for thought
- From: Janet
- "Food" for thought
- Prev by Date: Re: The French Paradox
- Next by Date: Is There A “Diabetes Diet”?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Food" for thought
- Next by thread: Re: "Food" for thought
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
