Re: OT Robbed again!

"M@©k®" <GodIs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ls3lh6hgle2s5u8akn15iaiqbqdb75pj91@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:40:56 -0700, "Budd Cochran" <mr_d150@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

If the display is a burning cross or a swastika, it is harmful.

Again, it's a statement, probably covered by the First Amendment, but I
agree that the intention of either is to cause emotional harm.

only if the person burning the cross or displaying the swastika are
doing so on their own land.


I don't think we were discussing private property displays, but you are
right, if the display is on private property.

Although, private property placed nativity displays have been attacked by
anti-Christian groups in the past.

Yes, a church lawn is privately owned.


--
C.L. "Budd" Cochran
Pray for the Obama administration: Psalm 109:8
http://truefree1776.blogdrive.com/





.