Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Oct 2010 01:38:56 GMT
Ozlover <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ozlover <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ozlover <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ozlover <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cheri <cherig3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alan S" <loralgtweightandcarbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v06na6tglidn5kdg00qt76eokfc04j4vkn@xxxxxxxxxx
On 5 Oct 2010 10:22:59 GMT, Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If all the people who see asd purely in terms of who is in
which "gang" or "clique" and who is attacking whom or what
would either shut up or actually start discussing diabetes
this would be a much more interesting and informative group.
I'm tempted to put the automatic +1 that so many non-thinkers use.
Some of us are a LOT more wordy than others, using 50 or so
words to agree, when a simple +1 would do nicely.
But still twice as verbose and time consuming as a simple "+" :-)
"+" *what*? A *real* programmer would never give such a response.
Shame on you! :-)
It's a reverse Polish "+" :-)
Cute, but it still needs something to be added. That something is
absent.
No, because the reverse Polish "+" requires that everything it needs
has already been stated. Which in this case it has by the prior
context. Nothing extra is required.
Sigh! Once more, instead of giving superfluous lectures, you should
concentrate on your own failings [1].
The reverse Polish notation is "X Y +". Y is the posting you're
responding to. What's X?
X is the posting you're replying to. Y is the rest of the posting
which contains the "+".
Nope. The "+" is "the rest of the posting" [1]. I.e. Y is absent,
which is what I said all along.
I thought you said you'd had some experience with reverse Polish
programming?
The "+" is the near the end of the post. Hence most of the rest of the
post precedes it. Hence a parser could interpret the preceding part as
a prior argument and stack it.
--
Chris Malcolm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re:+ vs. +1 vs. ++ vs.
- From: Wes Groleau
- Re:+ vs. +1 vs. ++ vs.
- References:
- High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: GysdeJongh
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: W. Baker
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Alan S
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Cheri
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Ozlover
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Ozlover
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Ozlover
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- From: Ozlover
- High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- Prev by Date: Re: ALA Question
- Next by Date: Re: Which type of ALA are you taking?
- Previous by thread: Re: High fat meal causes stiff arteries
- Next by thread: Re:+ vs. +1 vs. ++ vs.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|