Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- From: "Ozgirl" <are_we_there_yet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:52:41 +1000
Susan wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
agreed wrote:
I don't know why they even do HgA1c. It does not really tell you if
you're diabetic or the extent of any metabolism problem. They should
routinely do the OGTT instead.
I disagree.
The OGTT can be torturous and post prandial glucose testing far easier
and more indicative of what's happening metabolically in real world
conditions.
Susan
Torturous? Hardly. A regular type PP testing wouldn't show much except a
random number at a certain point in time. In the real world there are many
variations of diabetes/metabolic disorders. A one off random bg testing is
not going to prove a thing. If a random bg reading is inclonclusive for what
the doctor thinks might be happening or showing a high number (that is
*possibly* indicative of diabetes - remember the late Charles Evans' wife
being dx'ed diabetic when in fact she had another disorder, thyroid problem
IIRC), it still needs something more to help with a diagnosis. IMO the OGTT
has a lot of value and a definite place as a diagnostic tool.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- From: Tecknomage
- Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- References:
- A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- From: Susan
- Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- From: Susan
- A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- Prev by Date: Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- Next by Date: Re: It is illegal to be an illegal in Arozona
- Previous by thread: Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- Next by thread: Re: A1c not a reliable measure of mean blood glucose
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|