Re: Investigation into possible WHO and pharma scandal wrt H1N1 vaccination hysteria


"Cheri" <cherig3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hkhdr6019dt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Julie Bove" <juliebove@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hkhdea$obc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Cheri" <cherig3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hkhba3017l9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Julie Bove" <juliebove@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hkgo9t$v73$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I don't keep a scorecard. But I sure do see a lot of people doing that
with their "plus ones:" and such.

Do you not know that plus one means you agree with the poster, same as
your *yes* in answer to Kurts' recent post? Nothing to do with a
scorecard.

Doesn't look that way to me. Sort of like what we used to do when we saw
a pedestrian crossing in places where they should have. This was when I
was a kid and I certainly didn't start it. They were assigned point
levels, seemingly at random by the person who spotted them. Elderly and
blind people gave you more points.

Doesn't matter how it looks to you, it is what it is. LMAO in response to
some of your posts could mean "Let's Make An Omelet" or something like
that, but it doesn't. Next time you'll know. Best for us to give each
other a time out I think.

That should read "shouldn't have". And I know I'm not the only person who
read it that way because someone else questioned you too.

What happened to you lately? You used to be nice! Now you can't be civil
to me at all.


.

Relevant Pages

  • OK - heres a new thread to sort this mess out folks...
    ... as did another poster before me. ... Rom's idea that I could remove my drop filter ... Agent can't filter *only* on threads started by such posters. ... This is similar to Problem 1 except that the response from poster B ...
    (news.software.readers)
  • Re: Byetta is for everybody!!
    ... to Byetta has appeared from a new poster out of the blue, ... While the original post proclaiming that Byetta is for everybody ... your response is typical of what is quite wrong with this ... looking for information to help solve their very real health problems. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Dr. Schwarcz replies
    ... A google groups search revelas no previous posts from you. ... I would have thought that anyone who claims to be such a superior being that they have not only learned to think, and possesses such an arrogance that they choose to laugh at others as often as they can would have wondered how it is that a poster, who has not otherwise engaged in this skirmish, would have chosen to mention peer reviews. ... I wouldn't find Dr Schwarz's reply unusual between intimates either, but I do find his reply to be extremely odd when used, as claimed, in response to an email from an unknown contact. ...
    (rec.gardens.edible)
  • Re: Need Help...
    ... Art wrote: ... > There was nothing terribly wrong in Nathan McNulty's response to the OP. ... > a newsgroup that specializes in the area of interest raised by the poster. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Need Help...
    ... > Nathan your very hard on the mystery guy, ... There was nothing terribly wrong in Nathan McNulty's response to the OP. ... a newsgroup that specializes in the area of interest raised by the poster. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)