Re: Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- From: Trinkwasser <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:43:01 +0000
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:30:24 -0500, Màck©®
<Màck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's because we need to be controlling both not one or the other.
Already been/being ripped apart on several blogs. Sooo much bad scence
escapes the peer review process simply by appealing to dogma. Who does
that remind me of? <G>
.
- References:
- Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- From: kurtwheeling1965
- Re: Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- From: Màck©®
- Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- Prev by Date: Re: Higher Fat Lower Carb Bad for Type 1s
- Next by Date: Re: Site
- Previous by thread: Re: Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- Next by thread: Re: Post-Prandial v. Fasting Glucose: An End to the Debate?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
