Re: Usenetiquette

Again i was thinking about the "rules" and it seems to me that for a long
time it was a sin to snip and or post between a persons post as most all do
now...as i say times change.
My point on bandwith was that it seemed silly to repost 100 peoples
responses to a growing thread so that everyones post acumulates tons of text
that probably isnt even relavant to the conversation flow...
The die hard posters i know insits you must include EVERYTHING formally
posted and that seems silly to me but hey usnet allows people to do
whatever floats thier boat!

:-)

I dont sweat the small stuff...bigger fish to fry and what not.

KROM


"Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom> wrote

Snipping for relevance is always a good thing. :-)

Cheri



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sarah Palin (OT)
    ... Paul J Gans wrote: ... recently that Talmud considered it a sin to not to be skeptical. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sarah Palin (OT)
    ... Mitchell Coffey wrote: ... recently that Talmud considered it a sin to not to be skeptical. ... constituting the Just-so story "How Israel Got It's (Shockingly ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Hindu Bahai
    ... necessary for the same reason that the Immaculacy of her conception ... It was believed that had she committed any sin ... Me thinks alot of uneducated men made up alot of stuff that sounded good! ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)
  • Re: Sarah Palin (OT)
    ... recently that Talmud considered it a sin to not to be skeptical. ... Strange) Name," I find convincing. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Simao - On/Off/On
    ... > M> snip ... > M> isnt their a little problem with simao being cup tied? ... or even joaquin ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)