Re: HDL



x-no-archive: yes

Anil wrote:
Do you mean your TGL/HDL ratio? If I'm not mistaken, that's the one
that points to larger, fluffier, non oxidizing LDL.


Oh I did mean to say that my TGL/HDL is 1.94.

Okay.



HDL, but now, with pantethine, it's 70. LDL is 126, I think, a low % of
it is VLDL. TGLs are about 100 these days.


If your HDL is now 70 why are you worried?

I'm not. When did I say I was worried?


But I you did start this
entry with the following:


Hi all, I need help on my hdl. Getting it to go higher. It's in the 30's
now. My walks don't seem to help. I can't drink wine. Please help if you
have any ideas.

I didn't say that, I *responded* to the person who said that.



So do you or do you not need help with your HDL? Did miss a cue?

Anil


Maybe you should re-read the thread?

Susan
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: HDL
    ... Oh I did mean to say that my TGL/HDL is 1.94. ... it is VLDL. ... TGLs are about 100 these days. ... So do you or do you not need help with your HDL? ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Latest numbers. They kinda suck
    ... cholesterol should be the sum of HDL, LDL and VLDL. ... be no more than 22 in this case, for a total cholesterol of 154. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Latest numbers. They kinda suck
    ... Alan, please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that total ... cholesterol should be the sum of HDL, ... I would expect VLDL ... My VLDL is 8, TRIGS 41, which matches your formula. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Labs back today
    ... chol/hdlc ratio whatever that is ..is 2.3 ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Omega 3 egg scam
    ... I reckon his are likely to be in better shape than yours. ... Why don't you both post your HDL, trigs and VLDL numbers so you can ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)