Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: Quentin Grady <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:05:35 +1300
This post not CC'd by email
On 29 Nov 2005 16:25:12 -0800, "mrslang" <mslangerhans@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>but that
>doesn't fit in with your bitter cynical and pathetic hating about the
>ADA so you spin things however you want to that will fit your unhealthy
>low carb agenda. sad really.
>
>Sally
G'day G'day Sally,
I see you have taken to arguing with the judgment of Nathaniel G.
Clark, MD, MS, RD, is national vice president, clinical affairs for
the American Diabetes Association. The bloke shouldn't publish unless
he knows what he is talking about. <yeah, right>
Lighten up. See the funny side of all this.
Nathaniel made some good points in his article eg that most diabetics
in America are way out of control by anybody's standard except perhaps
their own.
If you'd like to discuss some of them I'm willing.
Best wishes,
--
Quentin Grady ^ ^ /
New Zealand, >#,#< [
/ \ /\
"... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: mrslang
- Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- References:
- Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: Sarah
- Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: Alan S
- Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: Jenny
- Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- From: mrslang
- Defending ADA's A1C Target
- Prev by Date: Re: A shocking haircut (on topic)
- Next by Date: Re: A shocking haircut (on topic)
- Previous by thread: Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- Next by thread: Re: Defending ADA's A1C Target
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|