Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- From: Grandpa Chuck <Grandpa Chuck@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:05:41 GMT
Since I do not see what you are replying to I will not answer any of
it. You have twisted my words and meanings way too many times for me
to trust you to not do that.
On 29 Nov 2005 12:08:59 -0800, "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>(apologies) The point of fact is that instead of accepting my apologies
>you began your standard pattern of insults. How do I know they were
>meant as insults? Sentence structure, sentence tone, punctuation marks.
>Now ask yourself why you couldn't have accepted those apologies and
>you'll find why we fight.
>
>Yes, in the past I've accepted your apologies and a few lines down the
>page caught it all again from you in a later reply, sometimes only
>minutes later. I think others have pointed that out to you in this
>thread, so why should I believe you know?
>
>(keyword) Since you cross the line almost completely/constantly I would
>need a dictionary to keep track of the keywords.
>
>(Christmas Story) Sorry, Chuck, but I will not post any verses you
>request, not with your past treatment of me. Why can't you understand
>that I do not want to risk being your targert again because I posted
>them?
>
>(OT) And why can't you post it since my original replies were on topic
>and you were the one that brought the religious aspect into the thread?
>
>(face-to-face) <LOL> Actually, Chuck, you've said things to me that
>would have gotten you sued, if not decked, right on the spot . . .if I
>were 30 years younger, not a Christian and you had said them to my
>face.
>
>But this goes back to my keeping the original meanings I grew up with
>for those words and not changing them into something unrecognizable.
>For that reason, though you may consider those words "common language",
>they are insults to those of us that still keep the original meanings.
>How tolerant of you is it to not respect that?
>
>You want the bickering to stop?
>
>Give the respect you insist on. Accept sincere apologies and keep your
>word. Be as tolerant of others as you want others to be. Don't ask
>others to do that which you refuse to do.
>
>Budd
>
>Budd
--
Grandpa Chuck
-ô¿ô-
~
The following information is given with the utmost respect
for the armed forces and civilians who have died in the
current war in Iraq. According to http://icasualties.org/oif/
The number of Americans killed in Iraq as of Nov. 29, 2005 is 2,110.
United Kingdom = 98 Other = 103
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- References:
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Grandpa Chuck
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Ma¢k
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Grandpa Chuck
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- From: Budd Cochran
- OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- From: Grandpa Chuck
- Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- From: Budd Cochran
- Re: Aspertame is totally safe
- Prev by Date: Re: Tight Diabetes Control
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Budd's rants - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Budd - was (Re: Aspertame is totally safe)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|