Re: FYI, all recent responses to Rich Murray on ASD, MHD: Murray 2005.10.21
- From: gswil@xxxxxxxxxxxx (guy williams)
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:28:40 GMT
Most of us are not interested in you except you do not
have the decency to not interfere with group interested in clinical
diabetes.
II have been exposed to advanced math and the proofs of so many math
items. I have been engaged in some astronomy projects and the
extrapolations so common here.
Sorry that is my limit and I do not use silly scientific jargon with
no meaning. Never saw those doing this do anything but blow hot
air.
So go the groups that find those exercises interesting. I am
still truing to understand a few aspects of blood sugars. You
will find friends there.
My professor warned me about the risks of extrapolation
and they informed me that common table salt is quite different from
the sodium and the chlorine they are derived from.
Have a food day.
Guy.
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:37:15 -0600, "Rich Murray" <rmforall@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>October 22 2005 In case some of you are interested in finding out more
>about me.....
>
>Oct 9 2003
>Rich Murray Room For All rmforall@xxxxxxxxxxx
>1943 Otowi Road Santa Fe, NM 87505 505-501-2298
>
>I am very taken with Lee Smolin's "Cosmic Evolution". It seems
>that our position in the single universal creative process is constantly
>being radically marginalized, as ~5% byronic matter turns out to be
>less than the ~25% dark matter, in turn less than the ~70% dark energy,
>while our whole physical realm may be a 5-dimensional membrane
>clinging precariously to something higher dimensional-- however
>this dazzling story evolves within the same source that sustains
>the visual space of "your" awareness, in which these crooked little dark
>letter ma r k s hopefully catalyze rapidly various comprehensions.....
>
>I hope you have had the great pleasure of the truly original
>"Time, Space, and Knowledge", 1977, Tarthang Tulku, Rinpoche,
>Nyingma Institute, Berkeley: http://members.aol.com/tskspace/
>*********************************************************
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rmforall/messages/6
>CSICON, Communion for the Subjective Investigation of Claims of the Normal:
>Murray's Law: Eternal Exponential Expansion of Science:
>Murray 1997.04.05
>
> Millenia of worldwide commonsense traditions have culminated in a
>recent few centuries of exponential scientific work. Since 1660, the
>number of scientists has grown from about 100 to about 10,000,000.
>Likewise, the volume of accumulated scientific literature, both
>doubling unstopably every twenty years, rather like Mickey Mouse's
>hordes of relentlessly marching brooms in Disney's "The Sorcerer's
>Apprentice".
>
> This global orchestration of thought and practice has been firmly
>founded on certain principles, rarely questioned and widely held to be
>unquestionable. Experience is held to be entirely based on and derived
>from a basic reality, itself "external" to experience: physical,
>or more abstractly, time-space-energy.
>
> This base reality is universally assumed to be impersonal,
>consistent, orderly, lawful, causal, uniform, single, measurable,
>describable and communicable, continuous, contiguous,
>inherently simple, and based on a small set of unchangeable (in
>themselves) logical-mathematical operations.
>Therefore this reality can be modeled
>and predicted by the self-qualifying global society of scientists,
>based solely on communication by the external senses.
>
> In short, the primary reality, and its derivative, conscious
>experience, is absolutely normal. The primary image of this paradigm
>is that of the machine, or the modern embodiment, the computer:
>well-defined elements interacting in three-dimensional space along a
>single one-way track of causality to produce utterly normal results,
>however marvelous, varied, valuable, or unpredictable they may be in
>practice.
>
> This towering structure of established normality paradoxically
>both hides and makes even more significant any hints of "nonnormality".
>Hitherto, "anomalies", such as random variations in offspring, the
>fogging of sealed photographic plates by uranium ore, or slight static
>in sensitive radios, have become mere fodder for the assimilation
>program of science, leading to vast extensions of the range of the
>normal, including evolution, quantum mechanics, and the Big Bang.
>"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated"-- the implacable
>marching song of the Borg juggarnaut.
>
> Willem of Occam proclaimed, "Thou shalt not multiply entities
>needlessly." Indeed, hordes of angels, demons, ghosts, spirits,
>influences, and innate qualities have been relegated to that final
>dustbin of our race's mythic heritage, children's Saturday morning
>cartoons. Mature minds, entranced by ever more lofty and subtle
>theoretical visions, fed feasts of observation and experimentation on
>every level, constrained by principles of parsimony, generality, and
>elegance, have exuburantly, soberly created in a mere century:
>
>at the ever tapering tail of the dragon, atoms that are .999999 empty
>space,
>
>said empty space as a fully occupied negative energy sea of prodigious
>density, with incessant particle pair production-annihilation within
>that good old vacuum,
>
>the equivalence of mass and energy,
>
>the relativistic variation of observed time,
>with irreducible randomness, fuzziness, discontinuity,
>and, feh!, nonlocality at the very core of reality,
>
>the weird phenomena of superconductivity and superfluidity,
>
>the ever fecund boson-fermion zoo of baryons, mesons, quarks, gluons,
>neutrinos, WIMPs, gravitons, Higg's, magnetic monopoles, and their
>antis, and their superpartners, all cascading into actuality as
>infinitesimal loops or membranes vibrating within that most spacious
>crystal of abstraction, E8XE8 Group (The Monster) Symmetry, while
>now 7 additional dimensions of space are parsimoniously mandated.
>Whew!
>
>meanwhile, at the ever bigger end of said dragon,
>suddenly the galaxy!,
>sprinkled with pulsars and quasars, oh!, then an expanding universe of
>galaxies, salted with gamma-ray bursters, oh!, that all sprang into
>being as a space-time bubble with zero total energy as an infinitesimal
>quantum vacuum fluctuation in "something", oh!, our bubble of galaxies
>extends 10E+25 further than the 15 billion light years presently
>observable (that's 10E+75 greater volumn, folks), oh!, might be untold
>zillions of universe bubbles, forever disconnected, each with unique
>intrinsic properties, effervescing cheerily within "something", just
>the facts, Mam, heh, heh. Funny what the principle of parsimony leads
>to...
>
>gee whiz, I near forgot, black holes, them's wierd nuff, huh? Lot of
>'em, too, all sizes! Oops, they evaporate! Blow up too! Wow!
>Gravitation radiation, anyone? We can plain see gravitational lensing!
>How about cosmic string and cosmic texture, frozen phase changes in
>space-time itself?
>
>remember, if it ain't prohibited, it mandatory. Yep! (Is anything
>really prohibited?) .
>
> I'm not complaining. It's surely wonderful. We taxpayers are
>getting our money's worth, and then some. But do you see any sign of
>convergence? Any saturation? Any deceleration? In emprirical fact,
>isn't what we see in a mere hundred years an unstopably exponential
>avalanche of proliferation of creative subtleties?
>
> Isn't the most obvious outcome for the next century a continuation
>of this inexhaustibly creative weaving of this coat of many colors,
>worlds within worlds, without end, without any possible end, not in a
>hundred billion years of sentient evolution, not ever, forever? Isn't
>this, ahem, trend, amen, the primary observational fact of the whole
>hundred years?
>
> I say so. I hereby dignify this empirical law by a suitable
>appellation:
>
> Murrray's Law: In the overall exponential evolution of the
>scientific process, the scale of reality available for consideration
>and the diversity and sublety of its entities and interactions all
>increase exponentially, forever.
>
> In 1660, the linear grid of Cartesian coordinates comprised the
>primary paradigm for scientific reality. On its empty black and white
>board Newton drew alike the falling apple, the orbiting Moon. Now the
>archetypal image is the Mandlebrot Set, brilliantly and arbitrarily
>colored, forever inexhaustible in timeless infinity of subtle detail.
>*********************************************************
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Prev by Date: Re: low blood pressure
- Next by Date: Re: Feet Hurting
- Previous by thread: O.T. Online Bill Pay Hassle
- Next by thread: Salacia Oblonga For Diabetics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
