Re: palm must smoke funny mushrooms!
- From: "RK" <reisak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:21:25 -0400
Are you naturally an idiot or did you have to work
at it? Don't bother answering., I honestly don't think
any of us really care, other then the fact we'll start
to post after you and show every newbie that joins
just what a jackass you really are.
1. I've been diabetic for over 5yrs. I listen to the
advise HERE more then my endo. Because the ppl
here live it daily AS I do... my endo does NOT.
2. I test 8-12x a day and I've NEVER gotten an
infection from testing -- more senseless crap you
know nothing about. LOL and I change my lancet
ONCE a YEAR and I lick my fingers to clean them
before I test and after!
3. So, Mr. Know-it-nothing... those who inject insulin
7-9x a day, only need to test 4-6x a day at most? So,
how do they know how much insulin to inject if they don't
know what their glucose is?? eh?? Right, just what I thought
you're another eediot troll.
4. And YES frequency in testing DOES IMPROVE a
diabetics glucose readings. There's more then a simple
handful here who can testify to this. And actual humans
testifying to something that works is far better in my book
then some eediot doctor who writes a book just to make
$$ off of it.
5. isn't there a freeway you can go play on now? and leave
us alone to care for our DM...
"palm" <palm650@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122760567.758495.98720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> would like to worn you, and not to change your testing or medication
> regimen on advice from people you don't know. This "test eight times
> a day" theory is "home made" and recommended to you by people who have
> no medical education and no clue. It is based on "testimonials" of
> less then dozen people, some of them with complications of diabetes,
> that may or may not be true, and, even when true, may depend on other
> factors, like genetic make up, type of diabetes, age of onset and so
> on, and was never proven or even assessed by medical professionals.
> This is just their opinion and in now way is supported by medical
> establishment.
> In contrary, American Diabetic Association (ADA) recommends lower
> number of testing, one-two or less, for stable diabetics on pills and
> 3-4 for diabetics on insulin. This numbers will be followed by your
> doctor and adjusted according to your condition, diabetic medication
> you take, other medications you take and laboratory results.
> Till new, "noninvasive" Glucometers, be available, you will be using
> invasive procedure to check your blood sugar. And, though, it is very
> important to test and be informed about your blood sugar levels,
> testing is not save or harmless. As any invasive procedure it has it's
> risks, like infection, bleeding and, by repeating stress, inducing
> neuropathy, with bleeding (bruising) more common, but infection much
> more dangerous.
> Numbers of testing, recommended by ADA are not just "dreamed up", but
> based on scientific research and balance of benefits and risks of
> testing.
> Before you even think about changing your testing and/or medication
> regimen on advice from "somebody from Internet", please, please, check
> with your doctor or Diabetes Educator and read this:
> 1)Frequent testing do not improve blood sugars.
> "the frequency of self-monitoring was not related to glycemic control"
> http://tinyurl.com/9ds79
> 2)"Tight control of diabetes" in not the same as "testing eight times a
> day", as some will try to confuse you. Tight control is about diet,
> exercise and your medication.
> http://tinyurl.com/9k84p
> 3)As a diabetic, you prone to infections, of skin, among others. Every
> time you penetrate your skin, you risk contamination.
> "Diabetes Sets Stage For Heightened Risk Of Infections"
> http://tinyurl.com/cvjco
> 4)There are many instances of infection, even when people don't test
> unreasonably often.(by increasing number of test 4 to 8 times, you
> increasing probability of infection 4 to 8 times,respectively).
> "Japanese Doctors Warn of Dangers of Blood Sampling from Fingers"
> http://tinyurl.com/ay34g
> 5)People have been hurt following ignorant and irresponsible advice
> from this board.
> http://tinyurl.com/bj3je
> 6)You don't need and can't make your "personal" "Clycemic Index"
> charts. They exist, easily available, and you can't do them better
> then they done, for example, at laboratories of Sydney University. And
> if you go to the extreme,as some suggest here, of stabbing your finger
> of more then thirty imes, do all tests right, for each food item
> (14.000 on Sydney University chart), you will get numbers that will
> correlate with "university" chart. Duh!
> http://tinyurl.com/9ab6u
> I would recommend you to go to American Diabetes Association web site,
> where you can get information that you can trust.
> http://www.diabetes.org/home.jsp
> There is, also, message board, endorsed by ADA and moderated by health
> professionals, so all "get rid of diabetes quick, easy and for sure"
> schemes are weeded out. If you have questions, you can ask there.
> http://tinyurl.com/7vtuy
> You are up for a long haul. Choose your advisers carefully.
> Good luck.
>
> rich wrote:
>> says it all
>>
>> Rich
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: palm must smoke funny mushrooms!
- From: WeeBit
- Re: palm must smoke funny mushrooms!
- From: metonymy
- Re: palm must smoke funny mushrooms!
- References:
- Newbie questions
- From: Terri A. Adams
- Re: Newbie questions
- From: palm
- Re: palm is a troll
- From: rich
- Please, don't change the name of the thread
- From: palm
- Newbie questions
- Prev by Date: Re: What I ate 7/30
- Next by Date: Re: Another Metformin Question
- Previous by thread: Palm's troll thread
- Next by thread: Re: palm must smoke funny mushrooms!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|