Re: safe to go patch by myself?

Smokie Darling (Annie) wrote:
On Aug 24, 7:49 pm, "earthpots" <earthp...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Smokie Darling (Annie) wrote:
On Aug 24, 3:47 pm, Zombywoof <Zomby-W...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT), "Smokie Darling (Annie)"

<Barnabus1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 23, 1:01 pm, ensoul <ensou...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
my dose is 150 mcg.........the dr recoponsist had a cow when I
told I was going to to do that......I neeed to get offf a fast as
possible.....I don't want it really helps pain but its the only
I'll be able to drive again

You've been told that it won't be safe to do that alone. Ask you
doctor for help and the 'reduction' schedule you will need to
follow.

I think some where about 100 times now by multiple different
people.

Well, maybe not *that* many times <smile>. I think that maybe her
reader is dropping some messages, so I guess my saying it for 101st
time wouldn't be too superfluous, huh?

She's using Google. So, nothing is being dropped. The problem is she
either or ignores, or forgets, what was already relayed to her
numerous times, and repeats question with new threads. If she
bothered to actually read, and takes notes, of what people have told
her, she would have seen that the questions were already answered,
many times over. It's get's very frustrating for us to waste energy,
and tax painful joints typing, repeating the same thing to her, over
and over and over again. Which might be one reason why she isn't
getting replies to this thread, people have grown tired of repeating
themselves. Before posting another thread, asking the same
questions, she should go back through her previous threads in
Google, and look for the answers already given.

Well, I use Google too, and have missed numerous posts, for whatever
reason. It wasnt' like I was saying something for the first time, I
simply stated that people had already answered her question. Sorry it
upset you.


Not sure why you think I was upset about what you posted. If she were ising
a server, your comment would possibly make sense, as severs lose posts, and
people (and severs) delete them). But that doesn't happen with Google, as it
isn't a news server, it's a news archive. I was just clarifying that the
posts are there, but she doesn't choose to read or acknowledge them. On
USENET, where emotions aren't easily coveyed, it's best to not assume that
someone was "upset" unless they say they are. She posts the threads, there
is *NO* *EXCUSE* for her to not read the replies already given.


--
Carol
Contessa of Consternation
Known to leave foes discombobulated

Autistic Spectrum Code v.1.0
AS? d- s--:+ a+ c+ p+ t-- f S+ p@- e+ h- r- n+(-) i+ P m-() M
http://www32.brinkster.com/ascdecode/

"I have run rings around you logically". Monty Python


Email at clay_pots_47@xxxxxxxxxx, removing the 'nospam' and replacing
with 'msn'.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: kwame brown is officially a laker
    ... >> the fact that trolling will result in someone being upset. ... If I had seen a smiley or a reference to that in his posts, ... I'll just leave this as is for now, as seeing on google that bozo-ak ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Re: A new hijacking
    ... Fitz wrote: ... > upset because people don't use Google to find an answer rather than come to ... (Anyone can check the posts for themselves.) ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: RAID 1
    ... >> repeated context that also clutters the archives, ... I suppose I should have given up on usenet ... he didn't have google to help sift through the cruft and probably ... It shows parts of your 100 most recent posts with links to the full text ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: JSH: Measuring post impact
    ... but mostly I use Google. ... noticed their original postings. ... Today my posts do probably get read by thousands of people ... Do some searches on primes and probability now, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A rather timely documentary on UKTV History today..
    ... that you must have used Google to retrieve that quote. ... you must have used Google - you called me a liar. ... A lie by omission this time. ... Not verbatim posts, no. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
Loading