Re: DR report con't its brief
- From: Top <top@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:39:00 -0400
In article <5356ff3e-7ed3-4c32-b2ed-c1aa977fa8b9@
33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, ensoul98@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
in caps he wrote"
I am going tio dschagreg her, I am going to take a few as medications
as possible, for instance, just to make as simple as to remove the
fentanyly (150 mcg) and she mosy likely will not miss it!
Diasgnoses: 1, Multiple medictations, possible interaction abad
adverse cebtral nevervous systen effects.
2, Chronic Oain syndrome
In Caps he states:
Specifically the patient and her family are tolf that she is ot to to
drive, and thar her insurnace is invaldid (don't have insunace in my
name) at thia time is she drives under the influencece of the
medications with her mind in the this state
I(Ihave to to take take it the fentany he means
I've tried to make sense of your last 2 posts and I think I have them
figured out to some degree. The bottom line being that the doctor told
you not to drive and that if you did your insurance would not cover
you. You said the insurance is not in your name. The fact that it is
not in your name will make no difference and could in fact cause
problems for the person that has the insurance for letting you drive
while under doctor's orders not to. The best thing for you to do, as
others have said, is to NOT drive. Do whatever you have to to make your
appointments until this is sorted out. To do otherwise WILL make things
WORSE.
Top
.
- References:
- DR report con't its brief
- From: ensoul
- DR report con't its brief
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions wanted...MSContin vs. Kadian
- Next by Date: what are the types of TENS
- Previous by thread: Re: DR report con't its brief
- Next by thread: you won't put up with me much longer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
