Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN

On Aug 21, 11:45 pm, LooseCannon <lambchop...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Juba wrote:
Joe_Z <J...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message:
luLxi.373$Uf7.47@trnddc06,

"Juba" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:163upc.m30.19.5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

blinded <blindedREMOVE T...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message:
46c62751$0$507$815e3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

"ÇáÌäÑÇá" <a_...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187365461.668553.238860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In The Name Of Allaah,

Nicely written

It's spam, doofus.

--
Juba
www.masterjuba.com

Yeah but it was nicely done :) excuse and thanks for no thrashing
:) Master J!...Joe

It doesn't matter how nicely done the spam is, it's still spam whether
he's selling something or not. This person has posted hundreds (perhaps
thousands) of newsgroup messages with the same theme.

This much we can be certain of:
<http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=%22S.H.+Pasha%22&qt_s=Search...>
Results 1 - 30 of 321 for " S.H . Pasha "

Let's examine three possible scenarios resulting from stroking this guy:
1. It's stupid to talk to bulk spammers because the probability of them
seeing it is slim to none.
2. If by some chance he does see it, you have rewarded him for posting
it.
3. Other spammers will see this and assume that this group is
spam-friendly.

It should also be pointed out that this may well be the work of a
propaganda arm of one of many terrorists groups who have been busy
trying to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by
so many into one that condones, compels and celebrates the killing of
all non-believers--including innocent women and children.

All good Muslims and especially all Islamic religious leaders should be
condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. If the
person who posted this is truly a man of peace, then perhaps he should
be educating the wayward members of his own religion about the wisdom of
non-violence before trying to convince us infidels that we should know
more about Muhammad.

This last bit is just so much racist horseshit! Its no differnt then
saying that all white men should be condemning the actions of a few
white men when it comes to ANY topic! Rape, wife beating, alchoholism,
to name a few....hell, where does it stop? What about marijuana abuse?
Theres always someone willing to stand up and say THEY are the "good"
person of their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or any other number
of identifying groups. However, it runs allot deeper then that.

I havent heard anyone ask that all "good" white ppl, or "good white
chrisitans" and their religious or other group leaders, too condemn the
violent actions of others, like abortion clinic bombers or school
shootings, child molesting or any other number of things that are
predominantly a 'white' phenomenon, even serial killings!

When an extremist group goes off on a tangent, its not the
responsibility of those who are being improperly blamed for it to
condemn it, speak out against it or anything else, cuz then it just
makes it look like there IS a connection to that group!

Cmon, all "good" white ppl, aka white christians, and their religious
leaders should speak out against all thats considered to be mostly white
and violent? If they did, it'd be all theyd ever be doing! It would
consume their time 24 hrs a day and there would STILL be things to speak
out about that are dangerous to society! Not only that, but just where
would the line be drawn to choose who is the"good" white christians and
"bad" white christians! If they are self appointed, chances are they
are just as capable of their own tangents and their own ability to
misuse religious dogma as the next person!

What happens if we end up with santimonious shit bags like Jimmy
Swaggart and Ted Haggard as our "good" white christians appo;inted to
speak out against things? There was a time thats exactly what they were
considered and they abused that trust and they condemned ppl who were
JUST LIKE THEM! So who gets to pick just who is the good ones?

Yer idea is useless, and yer logic is flawed, cuz once you take away
"Muslim" and insert "white" and/or "Christian" it doesnt work!

Like w/any race or religion, there are ppl w/good intentions and ppl
without good intentions who can sell themselves as being one of the good
guys, plus the very label of "all good Muslims...." is an insult to
them! There arent "good Muslims" and "bad Muslims", just Muslims, and
they have no obligation or ability to control these nut bags anymore
then some pastor in Toledo wouldve been able to change David Koresh!
And publicly condemning Muslims over what nutbag splinter groups do just
gives the groups more exposure and in the minds of the ppl, plus it
further connects them when there is no connnection!

Do you think you could walk into a church and pick out the "good" white
christians and the "bad" ones? NO ONE CAN! To suggest that someone has
the crystal ball necessary to discern between good and bad muslims is
just as absurd, cuz you can bet that between the violence, the so called
'bad muslims' are going to look exactly like the good ones.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What sa matter, sounds like you can't call a spade a spade
go ahead and call me a racist, miss goody goody twoshoes
or is it miss gumby damn it.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN
    ... trying to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by ... condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. ... Cmon, all "good" white ppl, aka white christians, and their religious ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN
    ... to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by so many ... condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. ... Cmon, all "good" white ppl, aka white christians, and their religious ... Middle French facetieux, from facetie jest, from Latin facetia ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN
    ... trying to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by ... condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. ... "bad" white christians! ... And publicly condemning Muslims over what nutbag splinter groups do just ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN
    ... trying to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by ... condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. ... "bad" white christians! ... And publicly condemning Muslims over what nutbag splinter groups do just ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: You MUST KNOW THIS MAN
    ... It should also be pointed out that this may well be the work of a propaganda arm of one of many terrorists groups who have been busy trying to put a friendly face on a religion that has been perverted by so many into one that condones, compels and celebrates the killing of all non-believers--including innocent women and children. ... All good Muslims and especially all Islamic religious leaders should be condemning the use of terror as a weapon--and yet they are not. ... I havent heard anyone ask that all "good" white ppl, or "good white chrisitans" and their religious or other group leaders, too condemn the violent actions of others, like abortion clinic bombers or school shootings, child molesting or any other number of things that are predominantly a 'white' phenomenon, even serial killings! ... There arent "good Muslims" and "bad Muslims", just Muslims, and they have no obligation or ability to control these nut bags anymore then some pastor in Toledo wouldve been able to change David Koresh! ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)