Re: Talula openly solicits drugs via this newsgroup



I don't care who he is. Have never tried to find out who he is and never
will. It's not worth my time. I waste enough time defending myself against
his tripe.


<Codeee01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c3tuf2lhsahhra28nj5mkqe1hsfh2hu62r@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:15:31 -0700, "NWBluePenguin"
<NWBluePenguin@NWBluePenguin> wrote:



Loooser C is simply trying to divert to topic from the perfectly
reasonable request for IT to post ITs' REAL LIFE into, since it
has it on everyone ELSE....that way, we'll KNOW just how
virtuous LC is, and how qualified to throw stones.

This is better yet, a peek into that nasty horrible mind!

codeee

Liar. I post to every on topic post I feel I can add either experience,
qualified references or know something about. I'd say that's a whole lot
more than you do. You're only here to destroy the group and people in the
group. You advertise it daily with you posting style.


"LooseCannon" <lambchop.LC@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:edluv0$7vj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NWBluePenguin wrote:

Give it a break. You've been here how long and this is the only thing
you post about. Everyone in the group knows all about this crap. You
losing your mind and have to keep reminding yourself or something?

Tell ya what....YOU give it a break. Youve been here too long, and
abuse
is the only thing you post anymore. Want it associated w/yer REAL name?

Just how much of this bull*** will you continue posting if ya know its
gonna be with yer full real name attached and quite a few more details
that you'd hate to be revealed here?

Wanna find out just how much I know? Post one more nasty word and find
out, you ***-filled whacked out bitch. I promise you, yer NOT gonna
like
it.

At least yer getting a warning. Thats better then Kennys ever done.




"earthpots" <earthpots@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f1nLg.4039$%75.2492@xxxxxxxxxxx

Codeee01@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:20:10 GMT, "earthpots" <earthpots@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

<snip>

Have fun

wading through those threads, though I seriously doubt you will.


At LONG LAST! You've finally got ONE thing right.
You're damn skippy I'm not going wading looking for ANYTHING
on myself OR anyone else! That is the province of others.


Then why did say you want the conversations about the pee in tampon
posts, in their original context, in the original threads?



It's SO very important, but not important enough for YOU to do more
than just repeat that same old out of context links others have
conveniently provided for you. F- for effort.


Wrong answer. I didn't repeat anything that anyone else did. I don't
recall *anyone* posting them. Nor were
anyone of them 'old', all were recent, some only a week or so old,
which
is why it surprised me that you would say these conversations didn't
take
place. And _no_ _one_ provided them to me. The recent ones were still
in
my newsreader, the June one was the only posts I went to Google for.
You
get an F- for not paying attention in class.

<snip>

codeee

--
Carol
Contessa of Consternation
Known to leave foes discombobulated

Autistic Spectrum Code v.1.0
AS? d- s--:+ a+ c+ p+ t-- f S+ p@- e+ h- r- n+(-) i+ P m-() M

http://www32.brinkster.com/ascdecode/decode.asp

"I have run rings around you logically". Monty Python

Email at clay_pots_47@xxxxxxxxxx, removing the 'nospam' and replacing
with 'msn'.







.