Re: NASPER BECOMES LAW



Juba wrote:
> "SandyG" <Mollypup1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dqhu13024fq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Juba wrote:
>>> "SandyG" <Mollypup1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:dqcilr023dv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> I still think this part of it is a good thing. I think it is people
>>>> going to multiple doctors and getting multiple scripts for the same
>>>> narcotic medication that cause trouble for the rest of us.
>>>
>>> So you believe everything the DEA tells you. No surprise there.
>>>
>>
>> Nope. Actually, I have not read nor heard anything regarding the DEA.
>> I am basing my opinions on what I have *seen* for myself.
>
> You have "seen" people getting multiple scripts and the trouble it
> supposedly causes for "the rest of us?"
>
> I don't think so.
>

Yes, I have. Believe what you want, but I *have* seen this.

>>> Some of those people are addicts and some are reselling the drugs;
>>> no question. But there are also some who are doing it because they
>>> can't get the meds they need and are entitled to, because of the
>>> DEA's harassment of Drs.
>>
>> Then what they need to do is to keep looking for a doctor that will
>> address their pain appropriately.
>
> So you've been living in a cave for the past 5 years?
>

Not hardly.

>> They also need to be willing to
>> learn and utilize pain management methods that are not in the form of
>> a pill. Not *instead* of medications, mind you, but *in addition to*
>> medications.
>
> Ah yes, the "Suck it up and deal" method of pain management. Mind over
> matter and all that.
>

Like I said, not INSTEAD OF meds, but IN ADDITION TO meds, Juba.

>> Believe me, I am not an avid supporter of our government. It's just
>> that no matter what the issue, personally, I think it is wrong to
>> manipulate doctors into giving scripts when you are already taking
>> the same med from another doctor. It is wrong, and dangerous.
>
> Yeah, it's wrong, but the far greater wrong is the DEA putting so much
> pressure on doctors that they refuse to prescribe or consistently
> underprescribe.

Hi Juba. Obviously, we are not going to agree on this issue. And that's ok.
I respect your opinions. Hopefully, you respect mine as well. I'm not going
to argue with you or with anyone about it. We all have the right to our
opinions. I am able to accept differing opinions without feeling like I have
to convince the other person to see it my way. I hope you are having a good
week.

--
-Sandy

"It's not the I. It's not the YOU. It is the WE that gets US through."


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pain Management Agreement - DEA required?
    ... if your doctor's a druggie who is diverting ... meds for his own use the odds are much greater that the DEA is going to ... Since a DEA raid will not only ... if your doctor gets busted by the ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Pain Management Agreement - DEA required?
    ... if your doctor's a druggie who is diverting ... meds for his own use the odds are much greater that the DEA is going to ... Since a DEA raid will not only ... if your doctor gets busted by the ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Pain Management Agreement - DEA required?
    ... Why don't you demand that your doctor get a urinalysis as a condition ... if your doctor's a druggie who is diverting ... meds for his own use the odds are much greater that the DEA is going to ... Since a DEA raid will not only ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Pain Management Agreement - DEA required?
    ... Why don't you demand that your doctor get a urinalysis as a condition ... if your doctor's a druggie who is diverting ... meds for his own use the odds are much greater that the DEA is going to ... Since a DEA raid will not only ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: FUCK THIS MOTHER FUCKING GROUP, GAWD DAMMIT
    ... are NOT being questioned by the DEA. ... dust settles and we have the semblance of a Congress again. ... >>nothing but cause harm to legit pain patients. ... Even if a Doctor is running a pill mill he may have ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)