Re: Dave and Juba, Cellmates!




Wow! Some of those names you call me and Codeee! LOL hehehehe Guess
this could backfire eh?



Rosemarie Shiver wrote:
> >Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
> >called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
> >harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
> >disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
>
> Geez...how's about a class action suit on Jite, Chris, and I can deal with
> Juba by myself. Do I hear test case? I do believe, according to this
> summary, that I have a cyberstalker and sock following me around USENET.
> LOLOL!!
>
> These idjits have been most annoying and it's in the archives. Wow, some
> of those names Jite calls me and others....
>
> Ker-CLANG!!
>
> Hugs from Rosie
>
> --
> "If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat Loaf, Bat
> Outta Hell II
> "Chris Morton" <cmorton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dpuj0s02qo9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dave and Big *** are SO screwed!
> >
> > Better ditch the aliases, FAST, boys! :)
> > ***
> > New Law Cracks Down on Blogs, e-'Harassment'
> > 2006-01-09
> >
> > Create an e-annoyance, go to jail
> >
> > By Declan McCullagh
> > news.com
> >
> > Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
> >
> > It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a
> > prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-
> > mail messages without disclosing your true identity.
> >
> > In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a
> > blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for
> > small favors, I guess.
> >
> > This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of
> > Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and
> > Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include
> > stiff fines and two years in prison.
> >
> > "The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv
> > Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.
> > "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
> >
> > A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet,
> > you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.
> >
> > "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to
> > originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are
> > transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without
> > disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or
> > harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined
> > under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
> >
> > Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
> > called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
> > harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
> > disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > --
> > Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
> 210lb.
> > rapists.

.


Loading