Re: The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- From: ZombyWoof <Zomby-Woofdogs@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:40:07 -0500
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:37:01 -0800, "Juba" <juba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>"ZombyWoof" <Zomby-Woofdogs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:bnt9m1db4khl4g2q78qhjh5jd1ml2rm1uv@xxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:51:38 -0700, "Juba" <juba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I don't know why the record comes up in a search, but it's no longer
>>> valid and I have provided the proof of that. Also, if I was a
>>> convicted felon I wouldn't be able to own guns. In fact, I had to
>>> turn in my guns after the conviction, but after the dismissal I was
>>> able to pass a background check and buy new guns, including an
>>> assault weapon. I have mentioned those guns in this group on several
>>> occasions. Of course despite the evidence to the contrary, some
>>> people will continue to believe whatever suits their agenda.
>>>
>> Are you saying that the weapons you turned in were not returned to
>> you? If so; what happened to them? Were you compensated for them?
>>
>> Since the weapons weren't used in the "crime" and not part of the case
>> why couldn't you transfer ownership to your wife or other relative?
>>
>> I am always interested in gun-grabbing stories like what happened in
>> N.O.
>
>The police held them till my lawyer filed a motion to have them released
>to him so they could be sold and the proceeds credited against the fines
>and court costs. He took them to a local gun dealer and only got about a
>third of what I thought they were worth.
>
That is semi-screwed up. Normally firearms hold their value very (if
maintained) and sell for very close to their new price. After a short
while they actually start to appreciate. This is especially true for
guns that the manufacturer has discontinued.
>I doubt they would have released them to my wife, perhaps another
>relative not in the same household would have been acceptable, but I
>didn't think of that and my lawyer didn't mention it. Perhaps because he
>knew that I didn't have any relatives in CA and sending them across a
>state line would have just added more complications. I didn't care much
>about the loss at the time because I had bigger things to worry about.
>
I really don't see why not. As long as she is the registered owner.
Her 2nd Amendment Rights hadn't been suspended. Although it probably
wasn't worth the court hassle.
>Anyway, I replaced all three guns (12 ga, Mak 90, Glock) just as soon as
>the conviction was set aside, except that I replaced the Glock 17 with a
>Glock 19. I like that one a lot better. I haven't actually fired any of
>them. I keep them in a gun safe along with ample supplies of ammo, large
>capacity mags (love those 100 rd drums), and gas masks; just in case.
>
It really isn't a good idea to keep unfired firearms that you expect
to fire some day. Most Semi-Autos like the Glock & AK need a couple
of 100 rounds pushed through em to get everything settled in and
firmed up. It is also a real good idea to have some level of
familiarity with them when it comes time to use them. Nothing like
pulling a firearm out of the closet and hearing a click when you go to
use it for the first time.
An interesting piece of triva; Norinco imported more MAK-90's rifles
from China then any other model of the AK type rifle or from any other
country.
--
Zombywoof
Si vis Pacem, Para bellum
.
- References:
- Kenny Padgett....a junkies best friend
- From: LooseCannon
- The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- From: Juba
- Re: The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- From: ZombyWoof
- Re: The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- From: Juba
- Kenny Padgett....a junkies best friend
- Prev by Date: Re: Good God, What Happened to this Group?
- Next by Date: Re: Shingles questions
- Previous by thread: Re: The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- Next by thread: Re: The LC/Ziggy criminal stalker convicts himself
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
