Re: Otp POLITICAL and I do not agree with all of it but it makes a person think

2006-02-28, Responding to Nann Bell...
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 7:26:36 -0500, MikesBrain wrote
(in message <0eCMf.69298$DM.29104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

The target site Harv posted is...

http://www.inlibertyandfreedom.com/

...so, you decide for yourself ok?

See my other response too if you will.


Mike@xxxx


you are quoting an incomplete link and attributing it to
Harv. Harv posted a link to a specific flash presentation
on this site, you however are presenting the home page of
the site as being what Harv posted. The original link is
http://www.inlibertyandfreedom.com/Flash/Think_It_Over.swf

No. I'm posting what you get in a text-only browser, and
what you get when you take a look at what the SWF link is a
part of, which I've already explained, the "target site".
You want me to explain it again maybe?

That flash presentation is very different in attitude and
approach from the homepage that you mistakenly quoted Harv
as having posted.

No. I did not "mistakenly" quote Harv. I've made it
abundantly clear about this. You want I should explain it
again already?

AND...

As I ALSO mentioned in a previous post on this thread, it is
my opinion Harv was "link-muled", as in, he found a file, in
this case a SWF file, that looks reasonable and worth
posting a link to. Nothing wrong with that. HOWEVER... In
failing to check what the file was part of, he also acted,
albeit unwittingly, as an introduction to the site I found
so objectionable. I was shocked that Harv, of all people,
would do such a thing. As it turns out, he apparently
didn't. My mistake, and I've offered an explaination and an
apology for it.

Geddit yet?

Or do you need me to explain it again?

BTW, I hadn't loked at this originally as I knew it would
take a while to load on dial-up and I didn't have the time
then.

I have dial-up. So what?

This fracas got me looking at it. While I agree witht he
overall sentiment, I can tell you that a) the author
doesn't live in rural northern Michigan! and b) I
disagree with the line about having more medicines but
less health - my mom, brother and I are all on medicines
that didn't exist 80-90 years ago, some that didn't come
along until the last 15 or so years. But were it not for
modern medications, all of us would have been dead several
decades back. When you look at medications and health,
you have to consider whether the person you speak of would
even have been alive in a different era!

You're wandering Nann. This has little or nothing to do with
the rest of your post here. If you want to "revue" the site
in question, feel free, but lets not confuse the issues any
more than they already are m'kay?



Mike@xxxx
--
----
* MikesBrain+WebStuff @ http://tinyurl.com/5ayqt
- Schauen Sie immer auf der hellen Seite des Lebens! :)
.

Relevant Pages