Re: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- From: "dwight" <tfrog93@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:44:57 -0500
"Buddude197" <buddude197@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166193488.402842.270360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The media needs to be dragged into a swamp and shot dead. All of them.
They consider the following article "smack". Sounds like a reciever
answering stupid questions to me:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16209789/
"You only have to imagine that they are going to have wrinkles."
Sounds like a slam against Garthia. Hell, I'd be pissed. That's bulletin
board material, 'far as I'm concerned.
dwight
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- From: Buddude197
- Re: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- References:
- Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- From: Buddude197
- Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- Prev by Date: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- Next by Date: Re: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- Previous by thread: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- Next by thread: Re: Oh for Christ sakes, this is "smacktalk" now?
- Index(es):