Re: Thank God that Indy....
- From: "Buddude197" <buddude197(spamsucks)@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:19:39 -0500
"ceadtinneh" <sulla33@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1137502116.780463.35900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Had that difference making Coery Simon at tackle...you know, the
> missing piece to the Super Bowl puzzle. Paul Grasmanis had better
> numbers than Simon did against Pittsburgh...AFTER he went on IR.
>
> Corey Simon is a pretty good tackle...but, as a wise man recently said,
> not at 250 K per tackle.
>
> And how about that every down back Duce Staley on the sidelines, in
> sweats (again).
>
> It was great, though, seeing Derrick Burgess run wil din the palyoffs
> once agai...oh wait....
>
16 sacks for a bad team, or more than all our defense ends combined. (Or any
combination of defensive line starters)
Wasn't Derricks fault the team stunk anymore then it was Kearses fault (at
600k per sack) that we stunk. That production was needed here. The Simon
thing is easier to understand, he wanted to be overpaid so despite his
better fit in our system (and more productivity) it wasn't worth it. Our
defense was awful for a good stretch.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thank God that Indy....
- From: pablo
- Re: Thank God that Indy....
- From: ceadtinneh
- Re: Thank God that Indy....
- References:
- Thank God that Indy....
- From: ceadtinneh
- Thank God that Indy....
- Prev by Date: some sportscard auctions
- Next by Date: Re: Thank God that Indy....
- Previous by thread: Thank God that Indy....
- Next by thread: Re: Thank God that Indy....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|