Re: Prominent Structural Engineers Say Official Version of 9/11 "Impossible" "Defies Common Logic" "Violates the Law of Physics"
- From: Kevin O'Connell <KevinO'Connell@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:21:17 -0700
On Fri, 30 May 2008 00:15:45 -0500, "Ken" <wh@xxxxx> wrote:
<JackShown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0d871675-4622-419a-a7f0-7eb83021f356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 27, 10:07 pm, "S/B 954RR" <jtibb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"George Orwell" <nob...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cd28255f3e6890edcfc7712ef456c0ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.
Don't worry, your wife and kids already know you're a kook.
Let's hear you explain why there was NO PLANE WRECKAGE at either the
Pentagon or Shanksville. You can start by showing me even one plane
wreck at any time before in the history of aviation that had no plane
wreckage. Try not to be so gullible.
http://911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html
http://911myths.com/html/flight_93_photos.html
Indeed, try not to be so gullible. Oh I know. "The government PLANTED that
so-called wreckage! It's all part of the conspiracy! YOU'RE part of the
conspiracy!"
Can you show me even one conspiracy theory not perpetrated primarily by
world-class nutjobs?
oh the humanity.... :(
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The ultimate coward
- Next by Date: Re: OT: mcClellen
- Previous by thread: NFL NBA Sports Jerseys in store
- Next by thread: Al-Qaeda's terrifying vision of a devastated America in the wake of a nuclear attack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|