Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: "Beiselbub©" <yank_ees_suck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:58:30 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 11:38 am, je.s.t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Beiselbub? <yank_ees_s...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, do you think the Giants realize they've been had yet? You just
KNOW they have been talking about going after his ankle, maybe even
installed a game plan designed to flush him from the pocket. The
Giants have to realize they lost the first battle of wits before the
game even started.
Count me as someone who doesn't think the ankle was all a ruse.
I look back at Belichick's comments: "I'm really excited about getting
you guys that injury report next Wednesday..." etc., and the wry smile
on his face, and then the relaxed way in which Brady answered
questions about the injury. They were much more open about discussing
the injury than they have EVER been. Count me as one who doesn't buy
the argument that they suddenly had a change of heart regarding full
disclosure before the Super Bowl. I think Brady might have had a
slight tweak of the ankle, but they decided to play up the rumor once
they thought it was advantageous or amusing. It looks like they were
having fun with it. If it was serious, they wouldn't be laughing
about it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: Glenn Greenstein
- Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: Orwell
- Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: markrlondon
- Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- References:
- Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: Beiselbub©
- Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- From: Beiselbub©
- Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- Prev by Date: Re: You're Forgetting Da Bears
- Next by Date: Best Pats-related article these past two weeks
- Previous by thread: Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- Next by thread: Re: Brady's ankle NOT on injury report.....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|