Re: Leak of the Pats' "Spy" Tape


"who'sthat" <whosthat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f5isg3p9mjs9f064d97boep74ovksnu9nd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:23:59 GMT, "Glenn Greenstein"
<glen.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"who'sthat" <whosthat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:559sg317ssu0jhb79unmgi6d82c189f0vu@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:07:03 GMT, "Glenn Greenstein"
<glen.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"who'sthat" <whosthat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qptqg35gf66mntifgr4mag2g5ph25f9dgi@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:51:53 -0400, MZ <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, who'sthat wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:47:47 -0400, MZ <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, who'sthat wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:25:58 -0600, Beiselbub©
<yank_ees_suck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:19:00 -0400, Frez
<dtetreault61@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Belichick thought it was worth it. That's all the matters.

Bush thought it was worth it to attack Iraq. Does that make it
a
smart
choice?


Comparing the loss of life to US military personel
to a 1st round pick is assinine. Bush's risk was
magnitudes above BB's and certainly required much
more thought. Belichick plays a game.

BB took a calculated risk and lost. Considering his
risk taking track record, I'm perfectly willing to let him
slide on this one.


Can a risk be "calculated" which has no demonstrable upside that
couldn't be gained through legal means--and a HUGE downside?
There
was
no calculation here, just blind stupidity or arrogance. His
cameras
could have been legally located--no risk. Someone needs to hire
an
accountant to do his calculatin'. Jethro Clampett isn't cutting
it.

That's YOUR opinion.
Common sense tells you that BB understood what could happen from
his
years in the NFL and it was worth the risk.
Please tell us your personal experience in the NLF that would show
you
have some special insite that we (and BB) don't have.

He didn't have any insight. If anything, his insight was that
nothing
happens to you, because he had reportedly been caught twice before.
Once
the media grabbed hold of this story, Goodell had to administer
discipline
to make him look like a tough guy. Why was the punishment so
arbitrary?
Because this sort of thing doesn't exactly happen every day.

Yes, I believe that Belichick, like everyone else, was surprised at
the
severity of the penalty. The whole thing was blown out of
proportion,
and
that sort of thing is very hard for anyone to predict.

Bull***. I think he's smarter than you.

And I think he's smarter than you. So how does that make you right
and
me
wrong?

You're the one accusing him of being an absolute idiot. You and a few
others seem to think he gave absolutely no thought to possible
penalties before he did this. That's insane.
And you're an idiot for thinking it.

And your an idiot for thinking he thought 750K in fines and the
revocation
of a first round draft pick was worth the risk of getting some tape that
has
obviously had no impact at all on the Pats ability to win.

What kind of idiot are you? So what if you think it's wrong..he
didn't. Your opinion means absolutely nothing to anyone other than
you. His opinion is the only one that counts here and his is the right
one otherwise he still wouldn't be coach.
Some of you are just to wrapped up in your fantasy world. NO ONE cars
what you think especially when you have no experience in the matter.
Go back to your tiny room and your fantasy football league. I'm sure
your kids and wife don't miss you.
And obviously nobody here cares about yours either.
BTW, *** you.
If that bothers you you little prick, too fucking bad, it's my opinion.

Based on nothing. There isn't a shred of evidence to back up your
claim.
Faux News is looking for help.

You claim BB thought it was worth the risk. Where is your evidence to this?
Don't tell me it is due to his knowledge of football. That is a cop out.


.

Loading