Re: Why I oppose seatbelt and helmet laws


MZ wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, john.vampatella@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
Now, that's pretty powerful evidence that, in fact, operating a motor
vehicle is not a constitutional right, but rather a privilege granted
(sometimes) by the government. Can you give me any reason to believe
that operating a motor vehicle in the manner of your own choosing is
somehow a constitutional right?

Ah, "constitutional right." You didn't say so. I don't know if it's a
constitutional right or not. You said "right", and that has an entirely
different meaning.

Read all my posts. That's what I've been talking about all along.

John

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT:Thanksgiving
    ... tentative excuse, but not the reason. ... Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; ... the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery - subordination to ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: OT:Thanksgiving
    ... tentative excuse, but not the reason. ... Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; ... the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery - subordination to ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: OT:Thanksgiving
    ... tentative excuse, but not the reason. ... Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; ... Civil War, anyhow? ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Why I oppose seatbelt and helmet laws
    ... vehicle is not a constitutional right, ... by the government. ... Read all my posts. ...
    (alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots)
  • Re: Why I oppose seatbelt and helmet laws
    ... vehicle is not a constitutional right, ... by the government. ... and that has an entirely different meaning. ...
    (alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots)