Re: OT: Liberal *** of the Year


God Hates Bush wrote:
In article <1143919727.381429.83880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
zaryzary2003@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I think you are probably mixing up the Libertarian Party with something
else. Lyndon LaRouche did not found the Libertarian party

Yes, he sure did. He tried to run for President endorsed by his party.
The crap you read online is this party tricking you into their cult like
hatred of blacks and Jews. PLEASE RESEARCH DEEPER.

I don't mean to be rude, but you are simply wrong, and the person who
needs to research the subject a bit more is you. The Libertarian party
is simply unrelated to Lyndon LaRouche. They are completely different
groups. LaRouche did in fact run for president several times, but the
Libertarians are a *different* party and nominated *different* people
for president.



They are 100%
anti-American. They have chnged their platform so many times in the past
30 years it is almost impossible to get any reading on what they want to
do. The only consitency is trickery.

Again, you are describing Lyndon LaRouche's party, not the
Libertarians. I'm not saying I agree with everything the Libertarians
say, but their platforms have been fairly consistent since they were
founded in the early 70s. Go look them up if you don't believe me.
They are not the same as the LaRouche people (who I agree are nuts).

They prey on the uneducated and
uninformed.

have any relation to it, as far as I know), but did found something
called the US Labor Party around the same time that the Libertarian
Party was founded in the early 70s. However the only connection
between the two groups is that they have similar sounding names.

They are one in the same group.


Wrong. The US Labor Party existed in the 70s and then was disbanded.
The Libertarian party has existed since the early 70s and still exists.
They have had several different candidates for presidnet, such as John
Hospers, Harry Browne, and others. They have never had anything to do
with LaRouche. LaRouche in fact ran *his own* campaign for presidency
while the Libertarians were nominating others.


The Libertarians are in favor of basically letting people do whatever
they want with as little government interference as possible. So this
means legalizing drugs, laissez-faire capitalism, free speeche,
pro-choice abortion policies, and other things which encourage peope to
do whatever they want. I'm not a Libertarian, by the way, but I do know
what they are.

BS.

You've said a lot of things here, and for me to take them seriously I'd
like to see a link with a reputable site verifying what you've said. In
case you forgot, here is a few things you've said in this string:

a) That Lyndon LaRouche is the founder of the Libertarian Party
b) That Lyndon LaRouche ran for president, and sought their endorsement
c) That Lyndon LaRouche is dead
d) That the Libertarian party is a cult

Link to something (reputable) that verfies that, if you are so certain
you are correct.


They want to control everything about your life. But mostly your
money. Notice how freedom of religion in their manifesto mentions only
"churches". No mention of Temples, Synagogues or Mosques. This is done
on purpose.


Please link to this document, because I haven't read it.

.

Loading