Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- From: jupiter49@xxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Mar 2006 09:08:06 -0800
MZ wrote:
"Fred From Dartmouth" <frederick.thurber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143774033.326875.228160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The other one that belongs on your list is Tim Dwight. For YEARS we all
complained that the team didn't have an explosive punt returner. Then one
falls into our laps (and records 3 important TDs in the receiving game to
boot) and the Pats didn't want to cough up vet min for him. File that one
under "stupid mistake that will bite Belichick in the ass."
I suppose you're right if we don't get a punt returner in the draft for
half that money.
I can only assume that they targeted a kid that will give us this
dimension back for half the cost, or even less. I'm not sure about
Childress .... hmmmm..... seems to me that he could return punts. I
think they want Childress on the team, don't you? I don't think he has
the speed of Dwight but he's certainly an elusive guy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- From: Fred From Dartmouth
- Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- From: MZ
- To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- Prev by Date: Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- Next by Date: Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- Previous by thread: Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- Next by thread: Re: To heck with AV, the big loss was Givens
- Index(es):