Re: Goodbye PK
- From: "D-word" <yank_ees_suck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Sep 2005 13:22:16 -0700
DavePitt11 wrote:
> "D-word" <yank_ees_suck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1125947171.600100.45290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > If he is so marginal, why is it that better P-L-A-Y doesn't unseat him?
>
> There was no better player there to unseat him.
There were two of them.
>
> > (He is the sixth WR, btw.)
>
> None of us have any way of knowing who goes where on the depth chart.
>
> Despite being so close to the precipice that
> > he "barely made it,"
>
> Again, none of us knows who barely made it and who was comfortably on the
> roster. There's only our speculation and press speculation. BB certainly
> never labels guys as on the bubble or 6th on the depth chart.
He's sixth on the chart according to how often he is used and his
production.
Use your eyes and your brain. Remember your brain, Dave?
> he continues to survive challenges from more
> > accomplished receivers,
>
> There were no far more accomplished receivers fighting for a spot.
Sure there were Dave, stop being such an apologist.
> and takes a roster spot from players at other
> > positions with more upside (such as Eckel, Bailey or Sam)
>
> How in hell does an undrafted free agent FB have lots of upside? If the guy
> had "upside" he wouldn't have lasted past 230 picks. And exactly what has
> Sam shown that displays upside? What, did that 2 yard catch he have really
> get you off your seat?
You obviously don't watch the game Dave. This is painfully apparent in
any discussion with you. Sam had seven pass attempts come his way and
he caught two for 19 yards. The point is not the ugly QB play of
Cassel and to a lesser degree Flutie, but the fact that he gets open
and involved in the offense. Bethel disappears both on the field and
in the box score. Johnson had all of two catches (2-17) be consistent
with your "logic" Dave, he showed less than anyone. Sam was the
preferred target, and was more involved in the offense.
> > Tell me why they are keeping him?
<snip>
You failed to answer that adequately. Sorry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: FE
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: MZ
- Re: Goodbye PK
- References:
- Goodbye PK
- From: jupiter49
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: D-word
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: MZ
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: DavePitt11
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: FE
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: D-word
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: dscotts
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: DavePitt11
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: FE
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: D-word
- Re: Goodbye PK
- From: DavePitt11
- Goodbye PK
- Prev by Date: Re: Goodbye PK
- Next by Date: Re: Damn, What happened to your group? Raider Post
- Previous by thread: Re: Goodbye PK
- Next by thread: Re: Goodbye PK
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading