Re: The truth about NFL contracts.

"Captain Charisma" <A@xxxxx> wrote in message news:sfSKe.4314$RZ2.1695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wow, it took you a whole 3 days to come up with this?

Come up with what? You chopped and top posted and snipped so much that you're obviously intimidated by what I've had to say, and this is the only way you think you can salvage your position. It's almost always the case, and you've proven it to be true in this case, that when someone resorts to those tactics, they know they're wrong, they know they have no defense, and so all they can do is to take snipets of what someone else posted completly out of context and try to structure some sort of story which was never the case.

OK, have at it.  Let's see how desperate you really are.

But then again, I'm sure it was just a deliberate attempt on your part, hoping that I wouldn't notice this latest response. That way, you can pretend like you won this conversation. It's your MO. Everytime you get your ass kicked, you either resort to this or your "I'm sure you feel that way" crap. Well, unfortunately for you, I did notice your response and am about to stomp another mudhole in your ass. Too fucking bad, bitch. 

I'm sure you feel that way, girly.

On August 4th, in this very thread, you posted the following:


"Therefore, the total amount of
money spent on players (i.e., all the money which all 32 teams spend on all the
players) will not change. Some players will get more, and others less, but the
total will not change appreciably."

The context does not matter here.

Of course it does, you fucking retard. Take a look at the very first word! *Therefore* means *for that reason*, and so the previous statement(s) is the whole reason for the one you posted you fucking moron.

And what reason would that be? To what change am I referring in the sentences you posted? It's the change from the current system of essentially non-guarenteed contracts to a system of mandatory guarenteed contracts. What a fucking idiot you are. Context doesn't matter? LOL! Fucktard.

In other words, forget all the talk about guaranteed contracts 

But that's the very subject that was under discussion you dip***.  LOL!


So once again, let me ask you if the difference between 56% and 65.5% is appreciable or not? Yes or no, Norman Bates?

Once again, you fucking wack job, that's not what's under discussion. 

.

Loading