OT - Bush to Children Everywhere: Drop Dead

Bush to veto expansion of children's health coverage
by Patrick Martin
2 October 2007

President Bush was expected to veto legislation expanding the State
Children's Health Insurance Program Monday, after announcing his
intention in his weekly national radio address September 29. The bill,
passed by the House and Senate last week, would extend the SCHIP
program for five years and increase spending from the previous level
of $5 billion a year to $7 billion, enough to increase the number of
children covered from 6.6 million to 10 million.

The veto is an expression of the greed and callousness of the American
ruling elite. Bush has made tax cuts for the wealthy the centerpiece
of his domestic policy, pumping more than $2 trillion into the pockets
of those already fabulously rich. Yet he has rejected as too expensive
a modest reform measure that would significantly reduce the number of
children living without health insurance in the richest country in the
world.

The bill passed the Senate by a 67-29 majority, more than the two
thirds required to overturn a presidential veto. In the House of
Representatives, however, the margin was only 265-159, with eight
Democrats joining 151 Republicans. At least 25 congressmen would have
to switch their votes to overturn the Bush veto.

The White House singled out a provision in the bill that would allow a
family of four in New York state making up to $82,600 to qualify for
state-paid health insurance, as though that was an outrageous
extravagance. Congressional Republicans denounced this as "middle-
class welfare," although given the high cost of living in the state,
and particularly in New York City, $82,600 a year for a family of four
is little more than a subsistence living.

This example was in any case a red herring, since New York is the only
state that has proposed to provide health insurance through SCHIP to
families with incomes up to 400 percent of the official poverty line.
New Jersey has sought to provide SCHIP for families up to 350 percent
of the poverty line, and all other states have set the upper limit at
200 to 300 percent (the federal level is 200 percent).

The result is that nearly all children covered by SCHIP live in
families with incomes below $63,150 a year (the 300 percent level) and
the vast majority live in families with incomes below $41,000 (the 200
percent level). The bill passed by Congress would actually make the
New York and New Jersey plans isolated exceptions, by sharply cutting
back the federal subsidy when states choose to extend insurance beyond
300 percent of the poverty level.

Under the patchwork and grossly inadequate health insurance system in
the United States, SCHIP is administered by the states under general
rules established by the federal government and with federal funding
covering the bulk of the costs.

The program was established in 1997 by a Republican-controlled
Congress after the defeat of the Clinton administration's plans for a
more comprehensive health insurance program. It was targeted at lower-
income working families rather than the indigent and unemployed, who
are covered by the Medicaid program, operated under a similar federal/
state division of labor.

With the army of uninsured swelling from 38 million at the time of the
defeat of the Clinton health plan to more than 47 million under Bush,
most state governments have taken advantage of the federal subsidies
in SCHIP to extend coverage to as many children as possible.
Initially, the program was limited to families between the poverty
level and 200 percent of the poverty level, but many states have
expanded the program.

SCHIP was initially limited to a 10-year period, and legislation was
introduced early this year to prevent the program from expiring on
September 30. The Bush administration was involved in negotiations
over the framework for the renewal, including an expansion of the
program and the inclusion of dental services and mental health
treatment on a par with other medical services. In August, however,
under pressure from extreme-right elements and from all the Republican
presidential candidates to demonstrate its commitment to fiscal
austerity, the White House announced it would oppose any significant
increase in funding.

The Bush administration also took punitive action against SCHIP
recipients, imposing a requirement in August that state governments
enroll 95 percent of potential SCHIP recipients with incomes below 200
percent of the poverty line before extending the program to families
with higher incomes. While justifying this change with cynical
rhetoric about keeping SCHIP focused on the truly needy, the real
purpose was to make it impossible for states to expand the coverage of
the program, since it is in practice impossible to reach 95 percent
enrollment for a voluntary program.

In the ongoing negotiations, congressional Democrats backed down
considerably, agreeing to eliminate a major provision to provide much
of the funding by cutting subsidies to private insurance companies
that offer HMO-style managed care for Medicare recipients. In a plan
worked out with Senate Republicans and then passed by both houses, the
Democrats agreed that the entire cost of the expansion of the program
would be paid for through an increase in excise taxes on cigarettes,
an extremely regressive tax that falls most heavily on the poor and
lower-income workers. Not a penny will come from taxes on the enormous
resources of the health-care industry itself.

The Bush administration continued to balk and threaten veto, and the
congressional Democrats then agreed on a stopgap extension of the
program until mid-November, so that Bush could veto the longer-term
extension without immediately cutting off SCHIP benefits, and force
passage of a watered-down version of the bill.

House Republicans also sought to disguise their opposition to health
insurance for children by waving the anti-immigration banner. The bill
contains reactionary provisions banning the use of federal money to
provide health benefits for "illegal" immigrants. But House
Republicans demanded more stringent enforcement procedures, including
requiring documents like birth certificates or passports from patients
seeking medical care, even for the care of newborn babies who, by
virtue of being born in the United States, are automatically American
citizens.

In a further bow to the chauvinist right, congressional Democrats
dropped language that would have guaranteed the right of the children
of legal immigrants to get coverage, an action that provoked many
Latino organizations to oppose the bill.

In their public statements, congressional Republicans, Republican
presidential candidates like billionaire Mitt Romney, and Bush himself
have attacked the SCHIP expansion as a step towards government-run
health-care provision. Typical was the comment of Texas Republican
congressman Jeb Hensarling, who declared, "This is a government-run
socialized wolf masquerading in the sheep skin of children's health."

This hysterical rhetoric is sharply at odds with the facts-not only
the actual provisions of the legislation, but the support for it by
such fervently pro-capitalist groups as the American Medical
Association, the American Dental Association, the American Association
of Retired People (which endorse Bush's Medicare drug program), and 43
of the 50 state governors (many of them Republicans).

Even the main insurance industry lobby supported the bill-in large
measure because like most Democratic-sponsored health-care "reform"
plans, the bill would create a large and guaranteed market for them.
State governments do not provide health insurance directly. Instead,
they subsidize purchase of private insurance by families eligible for
SCHIP.

The White House has repeatedly warned of the "crowding-out" of private
insurance as parents, particularly those in middle-income brackets who
become eligible for SCHIP, choose a government-funded plan rather than
paying for private insurance on their own or through their employer.

The concern is that millions of people, given the choice, will prefer
a publicly funded plan over one tied to the vagaries of market. The
hysterical, anti-socialist red-baiting reflects a well-founded fears
that any shift away from market-driven health-care policies could open
the door to popular demands for measures far more radical than
anything envisioned by the Democratic Party.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Getting to the Bottom of the SCHIP Debate
    ... Getting to the Bottom of the SCHIP Debate ... Without more health insurance, more kids will get sick and die. ... They just don't want "big government" ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: OT - Bush to Children Everywhere: Drop Dead
    ... The government can't spend any more money to meet its Constitutional duty of providing for the General Welfare because Bush needs it to finance his military adventures. ... Children's Health Insurance Program Monday, ... passed by the House and Senate last week, would extend the SCHIP ... most state governments have taken advantage of the federal subsidies ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Re: Playoff Baseball
    ... Children's Health Insurance Program is about children, ... SCHIP was created in 1997 by a Republican-controlled Congress. ... willing to do something bad for the kids", ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: Playoff Baseball
    ... Children's Health Insurance Program is about children, ... SCHIP was created in 1997 by a Republican-controlled Congress. ... willing to do something bad for the kids", ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Getting to the Bottom of the SCHIP Debate
    ... Getting to the Bottom of the SCHIP Debate ... Without more health insurance, more kids will get sick and die. ... They just don't want "big government" ...
    (soc.retirement)