Re: OT - Who's Who? Sock Puppet Summary??

Sports Fan wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2005 13:24:21 -0700, "mr. gone" <mr_gone78@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Sports Fan wrote:
> >> On 31 Aug 2005 05:32:31 -0700, "mr. gone" <mr_gon...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> >> >> >> >you're such a devout christian...
> >> >> >> >> Leave my religion out of this, you retard.
> >> >> >> >why?
> >> >> >> Because this is not a religious discussion newsgroup, nor did I recall
> >> >> >> attacking anyone's faith, sexual orientation, political affiliation,
> >> >> >> national origin, race, ...etc.
> >> >> >but the way you interact with people completely belies your claims.
> >> >> When I am attacked I fight back, I am not 100% perfect, I am human
> >> >> after all.
> >> >so was jesus.
> >> You're confused.
> >> Jesus was God in human body.
> >
> >so god died? how is this possible?
> >
>
> You are confused, and don't understand the concept of the religion
> that you declared as violent and war supporting.
> I suggest you read about it, before you go after people based on your
> failure to understand what you are talking about.
>
non-answer. how can god die?
>
> >> >> Welcome to reality.
> >
> >> >oh, so extenuating circumstances allow one to "break the rules".
> >> >christianity of convenience, huh?
> >> No.
> >> I am not perfect, but we already established that you are confused and
> >> have no grasp of facts.
> >
> >no, you haven't.
>
> ROFL.
> If you say so, read few lines above this.
>
> You ARE confused.
>
saying it over and over doesn't make it true.

> >you've only established that your beliefs go no farther than lip service.
>
> If you say so, but reality disagrees, and we both have established
> that you are reality challenged.
>
really? based on what?
>
>
> >> >> >smacks of hypocricy.
> >> >> Like the rest of the posters here, yourself included.
> >> >what's hypocritical about what i'm saying or doing?
> >> You're going after someone while asking him not to go after others,
> >> for starters.
> >
> >how am i "going after" you?
>
>
> Look in this thread, and read your posts.
> In fact, the last couple of days, you have posted almost nothing but
> personal attacks against me, you liar.
>

> > i'm pointing out your hypocricy,
>
> So that is not going after someone?

no.

> Accusing him of hypocrisy is not going after someone?

no, when it's the truth.

> Wow, not only you are a liar, you are also confused in your own native
> language.
>
nope.
>
> >which is quite obvious.
>
> According to someone who has yet to post a credible post and stop
> lying, and has yet to show that he understands the thing that he hates
> so much.
>
what have i "misunderstood?"
>
>
> >> >> >> >if you spend time time telling others how they're condemned for
> >> >> >> >not being like you,
> >> >> >> When and where did I do that?
> >> >> >> You blinded by your hate so badly that you can't even tell who's doing
> >> >> >> what.
> >> >> >what hate?
> >> >> hate for Christianity.
> >> >not at all.
> >> If you say so, your hate is so obvious that even you can see it.
> >
> >how?
>
> Read your own posts.

no evidence of hatred on my side.

> And don't tell me that it was someone else posed as you.
>
that would only make sense if i felt the need to deny something.
>
> >> >jesus' teachings were the greatest ever.
> >> Your posts were questioning all that.
> >
> >where?
>
> Go to groups.google.com and search for the thread "OT Onward Christian
> Soldiers", and get back to us.
> Read your own words and weep.
>
where am i showing a single bit of hatred toward true christianity?
>
> >> >what i can't stand
> >> >is people claiming to follow him, but not doing it.
> >> According to you.
> >
> >according to the bible.
>
>
> >you think jesus or his early apostles would act
> >
> >like you?
>
> Definitely not, that is why Jesus is God, and that is why he chose his
> early Apostles you reality challenged confused one.
>
so it's okay for you to act differently?
>
> You make it sound like I am nothing but an evil person, do you
> honestly believe your own nonsense?
>
i think you're untrue to your claimed beliefs.

> If replying to hostility makes me bad in your eyes, then you have a
> problem.
>
where have i been hostile to you?

> But shouldn't you, Mr. "I am the keeper of who is a true believer and
> who is not, who is a hypocrite and who is not" refrain from doing the
> same thing that you are supposedly against?
>
again, where have i displayed one iota of hostility to you?

> Shouldn't you be a peaceful person and refrain from lying, snipping
> parts that you don't like or can't answer or ignore them, or even take
> words out of context trying to win an argument that you have lost long
> time ago?
>
i haven't lied. i've taken no words out of context. i've snipped
nothing.

> In this post you claim that you are a believer and paint yourself as a
> model Christian, while few posts earlier you claimed that Christianity
> was a violent religion and should be blamed on all the violence out
> there.
>
the realm of christendom, false christianity, is full of violence. to
say otherwise is denial of reality on your part.

> So much for the fake image that you are trying to build for yourself,
> and so much for your claims of not being a hypocrite.
>
again, you can say this stuff over and over, but it doesn't make it
true.
>
>
> >> >> >am i the one using foul language to people?
> >> >> Yes you and your friends all are doing so.
> >> >where have i used foul language? google it - you'll never find it.
> >> You may have not used the exact words but all your posts imply insults
> >> and crap like that.
> >
> >point it out, since all you can do is infer.
> >
>
> Would it matter?
> You will whine, moan and deny it, and after all, that's all you have
> been doing so far.
>
translation: "i can't do it"

> Go read your posts.

i have. nothing insulting anywhere.

> Every other line implies an insult and tries to discredit the person
> that you are talking to, hiding behind that fake "I am a calm person"
> image.
>
point it out, or drop it.
>
> >> As for my alleged use of foul language.
> >> I challenge you to show a single instance of me doing that which was
> >> not returning a similar insult.
> >
> >doesn't matter.
>
>
> Translation: I cannot.
>
> Thank you for admitting that.
>
> One can only hope that you can learn from this when you see your lies
> blown to pieces.
>
> >the idea is that you're supposed to behave better than
> >the "heathens".
> >
>
>
> I am, I never start hostility, and never went after someone because I
> didn't like his faith, unlike you and few retards like you here.
>
funny. you attacked me when i posted here the first time, when not one
bit of it was directed at you. so you *are* lying when you say this.
and you still are doing nothing to set yourself apart from the atheists
out there.
>
> >> You'll never be able to do so.
> >
> >doesn't matter.
>
> Translation: I cannot.
>
again, a nice avoidance.
>
> >> >as
> >> >for "friends" - i speak only for myself.
> >> You mean like jumping in the middle of threads trying to defend
> >> someone?
> >
> >i'm defending no one.
>
> You jumped in this thread defending "Dewey" when he was told to keep
> religion out of this, remember?
>
no, i didn't. i replied to you and what you said. had nothing to do
with dewey.

> What is this?
> Short memory span?Or low IQ?
>
i'd say it's misreading on your part.

> I strongly think that it is both.
>
>
> >i'm only talking to you, about you.
> >
>
> Your ultimate obsession.
> Glad you admit it.
>
again, you must have an incredibly high opinion of yourself.

> You couldn't handle seeing someone say that he is Christian, and
> immediately jumped in trying to discredit him and make him look like
> he is something that he is not.
>
you did a fine job of that yourself.

> Your driving force is your hate, and you will do this against anyone
> who says that he is Christian, no matter what he did.
>
no, only when you act like you aren't do i feel a bit of hate, and
that's only for what you're doing.

> If he doesn't fight back, then he is a loser and you were right, if he
> fought back then he is not a true Christian since, in your flawed
> logic, Christians have no right to defend themselves against your
> type.
>
or maybe if he would admit that perhaps he's not emulating christian
principles very well, my opinion would go up.
>
> >> Sure.
> >> >you're the only one calling
> >> >themselves christian here, but not following those principles.
> >> Where in the principles it says that I cannot post on usenet?
> >
> >it's the way you do it, a fact you repeatedly ignore by making
> >statements like this.
> >
>
> What fact?
> Where does it say in the Bible that you cannot defend yourself or
> cannot post on usenet?
>
doing it with foul language is christian - how?

> You have failed to answer this question, but that's hardly news.
>
just did. for the nth time.

> >> You're confused.
> >> >> >am i the one going around trying to find support claiming multiple posters are the
> >> >> >same person,
> >> >> I don't need to "trying to find support", I posted facts, and if you
> >> >> are too stupid to understand them, then that is your problem.
> >> >facts which nobody else is really taking seriously.
> >> Some did.
> >
> >who?
>
> That is not your business.
> I have private email from people who already know my email address
> that I am not going to post in public, no matter how you whine about
> it, or complain.
>
they must really like you if they'll only e-mail it.

> Feel free to call this a lie, if that makes you happy.
>
i can't confirm or deny it.
>
> Oh, and one of those people who agreed is the one that you slurped in
> the past, "Laurel" posted agreeing, but then realizing that she was
> agreeing with me, she turned it into a flame fest.
>
i haven't read those parts of the thread - they aren't relevant to me.

> But that's hardly the point.
>
true.

> The point is that fact is established that the person I exposed was
> using sock puppets added to the fact that those sock puppets
> disappeared.
>
which accomplishes what, other than making you feel big?

> Get over it.
>
nothing to get over. i don't care one way or the other.

> >> But who cares if someone takes facts seriously or not?
> >> A handful of retards, yourself included, hardly makes a fact not a
> >> fact.
> >
> >a single person harping on something over and over again hardly makes
> >it relevant.
> >
>
> There is no harping.
> There are facts, but you are too stupid to read headers and see them.
>
what, about 40 posts saying the same thing isn't "harping"? lol.

> Others have agreed with it, even one of the persons that usually
> claims disliking me agreed too.
>
which still doesn't make you right, or mean that it's relevant.
>
> >> >i think that's the whole crux of the matter - the need on your part to be seen as legit
> >> >somehow.
> >> There is no need.
> >> You can't hide the sun.
> >
> >i'm speechless.
>
>
> You should be.
> You are also stupid, and that is proven by your actions on usenet.
>
how?

> >do you really think that highly of yourself?
>
> Yep, and I am very proud of myself.

there's another fine christian trait.

> The fact that I am being the target of people like you, dumb as a
> brick and few others proves that I am way much better of you.
>
or maybe it's the other way round.

> Jealousy is an ugly thing, like the wise man said.
> Hate is even worse.
>
i wouldn't know.

> You seem to be suffering from both.

you *wish* i was suffering from both.

> You have my sympathy, despite being so annoyingly stupid.
>
so, i'm supposed to believe it because you say it? you won't give me
that consideration.
>
>
> >> Your fellow retard was exposed as a kook that talks to himself, it's
> >> over get used to it.
> >
> >doesn't bother me one way or the other.
>
>
> Of course not, you seem to be of the same ilk.
> I wouldn't be surprised if you were caught doing the same thing one
> day.
>
nope.
>
> >i'm not defending anyone.
>
> Yes you are.
>
okay - who am i defending? cite a specific example.

> >if you want to believe it's so important,
>
>
> No I don't, I just posted exposing someone who claimed that I was
> wrong, called me names for saying so, and denied being a liar and a
> kook.
>
what names have i called you, aside from saying that you're behaving
like a hypocrite.

> It's done, it's over, get over it, and get a life.
> You keep referring to it, and keep whining about it.
>
referring to what? i'm not claiming to defend anyone - you're the one
who keeps saying i am.

> >by all means do so,
>
>
> I already did, and there was nothing you could do about it, except
> whining like this.
>
where did i whine?

> >but don't believe for a minute that i do.
>
> You obviously do.
> Otherwise why would someone keep bringing it up?

bringing what up? i'm not defending anyone, or claiming to. you're the
one claiming i am.

> Just like that "bryguy" and "Jeff" characters, you claim that you
> don't care, but somehow keep coming back to it, and keep talking
> about, and spend hours flaming me about it.
>
where have i flamed you?

> If there is any thing more important for you in life you and them
> would have paid more attention to it and moved on.
> But you (plural) morons can't, because you DO care, and in fact are
> obsessed.
>
says the guy with about 150 posts over the last 3 days, dealing with
the same topic.
>
> >> >> >then screaming when others didn't take me seriously? i
> >> >> I scream when screamed at.
> >> >> Get used to it.
> >> >i'm not screaming.
> >> Yes you are, but living in denial, as usual.
> >
> >how am i screaming? prove it.
> >
>
> Why should I?
> Read your own posts, they are full of screaming/whining.
>
cite.

> "You are a hypocrite! Whah! Whah! Whah! "
> "You are not acting like a true Christian!"
>
> And so on.
>
which sounded nothing like that.
>
> >> >you *are* screaming back at me.
> >> Nonsense.
> >
> >so using foul language, name-calling and
>
> Those are used in return.
> You keep whining about foul language while it was only was only used
> back at the person who used it.
>
> And of course in your world when your retarded friends call someone
> "mindfucked", "***", "fucked" and other names, that is "funny" and
> should be allowed because it is "The truth", but when someone responds
> to those with same or even less hostility, then he is an evil person.
>
they're not my friends. they're not claiming to be christian. you are.

> You did mention hypocrisy, didn't you?
> Just look in the mirror.
>
they're living up to their claimed standards in life. are you?

>
> >constant denigration aren't "screaming"?
>
>
> So constantly calling someone names like hypocrite, liar, "vulgar" is
> not "denigration"?
>
i've cited specific reasons why your actions deserve those labels. you
aren't denying those actions.

> So you are only allowed to do it and others are not?
>
so when the apostle paul wrote in his letters about people being
sectarians and liars, he was denigrating them? those are qualities that
are not to be a part of true christianity. hypocricy is another. you've
manifested those qualities, but you claim to be christian. i guess what
you're saying is that there aren't any standards of right and wrong,
since calling someone out for breaking them is wrong.

> I sure hope that you are not a judge or even serve as a juror one day.
>
why?

> >> You started attacking my posts unprovoked.
> >yeah, your language showed you as such a devout sort.
> >
> >> If you don't like seeing me fighting back, then either stop your
> >> pathetic attacks or go back to the Celtics newsgroup.
> >
> >you would only be "fighting back" if i felt this was a fight. it isn't.
>
> I don't know about you, but it seems that you consider personal
> attacks as something normal.
> I don't.

lol.

> When I see someone who has no other goal in life other than
> discrediting me and personally attacking me, I fight back as I see
> fit.
>
if you really think denigrating you is my only goal in life...

>
> >your struggle is with yourself and reality.
>
> ROFLMAO!!!
>
> If you say so.
> So reality, according to a confused moron like you, is that headers
> don't count, and facts should be taken as we please, and even if you
> don't understand the concept of a religion you are allowed to talk
> about it and judge anyone who believes in that religion.
>
let's see - you're acting unchristian, yet you claim i don't understand
christianity?

> Sure, and I am certain that someday you would like to suggest that the
> Earth is flat.
>
neil armstrong says "hi"

> There is no struggle, dummy, there is only those vicious but fruitless
> attacks by you and couple of retards like you, and while I am wasting
> some time education your morons and arguing with you, I can assure you
> that it won't last for long, because most of you are hopelessly stupid
> and terminally incompetent.
>
"no struggle"...lol.

>
> >> What's the matter, too quite there for your liking?
> >
> >does that make a differce?
>
> It seems that it does.
> Otherwise why would you come to a newsgroup that you should have no
> business in, and try to make friends in it by going after certain
> people?
>
i have no friends on usenet. don't want any.

> You're bored there, almost no trolling, almost no mischief, and this
> newsgroup has plenty to offer, and you live on this.
>
like i said - lots of good news stuff here.
>
>
> >> It seems that you live on such mischief, and you like the trolling and
> >> the nonsense going on here, no wonder you hang in here trying to make
> >> friends here, in a newsgroup that talks about a team that you
> >> allegedly hate.
> >
> >i'm not looking to make friends on usenet.
>
> It seems that you are, otherwise you would have not slurped Laurel and
> others, nor jumped in to side with "Dewey" and his likes.
>
you claim i did whatever. prove it.
>
> >this ng keeps me informed on
>
> If this is your source for information, then no wonder you are
> confused and misinformed in almost everything that you opened your
> mouth about.
>
i don't read your posts very often. makes me less confused.
>
> >world events a lot better than the mainstream media.
> >
> >> >> >just don't understand how you can claim to follow christ but do things
> >> >> >opposite of the way he said to live.
> >> >> So Christ said that you can't post on usenet?
> >> >> My God, you are so stupid and full of hate.
> >> >when you do it in an attacking,
> >> I never attacked anyone.
> >
> >
> >> I responded to attacked.
> >
> >i didn't attack you.
>
> Denying something doesn't hide it.
> You DID attack me, at least be a man(?) and stand up for what you
> think and take responsibility for your actions.

how did i attack you? cite.

> But we already established that you lied before, therefore I am not
> surprised to see you lie again.
>
i didn't attack you.
>
> >> >hateful
> >
> >> Funny you should mention hate.
> >> The only hate I see here is coming from you and your type, since I
> >> said that I am Christian, I am getting nothing but personal attacks
> >> from certain people.
> >
> >most of the attacks are because of your behaving in an unchristian way.
> >
>
> No, most of the attacks are because I just said that I am Christian.

nope.

> And since most of you retards would like the world to go your way, and
> you hate Christians and Christianity, that immediately triggered your
> obsessive compulsive pitiful personal attacks.
>
i don't hate true christianity at all.

> Just like a drunk driver on the freeway, the minute he will see a
> colored light or the back lights of a parked car on the shoulder he
> will hit that car.
>
which has what to do with anything?
>
> >> >and vulgar way,
> >
> >> What vulgar?
> >> I replied to vulgarity with the same to a much lesser degree too.
> >
> >swearing. name-calling.
>
>
> In response to be called the same.
>
nope.
>
> >you, as a "christian", are supposed to be the
> >exemplar - remember?
> >
>
>
> I am a human, when I get called names I respond when the peaceful
> action doesn't work.
>
in other words, "i only act like a christian when i feel like it"

> Get used to it, grow up, and find another thing to whine about.
>
oh, i'm used to it. i expect it.

>
>
> >> You blinded hate for Christians is what telling you read selectively
> >> and be so blind not to see the real vulgarity and where it is coming
> >> from.
> >
> >only for those like you who claim to be such but act differently.
> >
>
> If you say so.
> Your actions are even worse, trying to stir up fights, name calling,
> hating, are all against Christianity, and you say that you are a
> believer.
>
i only have a hard time with those who claim to live it but don't. you
claim to believe in a standard, but you don't live by it.

> You should start going after yourself before going after others.
>
i do.
>
> >> >yes, you are
> >> >not following christ.
> >
> >> You don't even know Christianity, you're hardly qualified to judge
> >> people whether they are following it or not.
> >
> >i know it quite well, thank you.
>
>
> If you say so.
>
> You already proved that you are clueless about it.
>
how?

> >enough to know you don't exemplify
> >what true christianity is.
>
> According to you, someone who doesn't understand Christianity, and
> things that humans should be as powerful and flawless as God.
>
> You are a joke, a pathetic one too.
>
so, you yourself don't claim to live by it - how can you call yourself
a christian?
>
> >> >> >> >shouldn't you show yourself uniquely better
> >> >> >> >somehow? wouldn't not being that way be hypocritical?
> >> >> >> It would if I tried to force my opinions on any one, but obviously you
> >> >> >> can't read.
> >> >> >not living a life you claim to live is also hypocritical.
> >> >> What did I claim to live?
> >> >a christian life.
> >
> >> When?
> >> You are a liar.
> >
> >being a christian means living the life.
>
> No.
> That is what you are saying to justify your lies and hate.
>
again, what did james say about faith without works?

> Being a Christian is simply believing in God, believing in Jesus.
> There is no 100% perfect human.
>
don't have to be perfect.

> You are confused,.
>
nope.

> >if you aren't living it, you aren't a christian.
>
> You are confused.
>
nope.
> Go read about it a bit and then get back to us.
>
i've read plenty. james, paul - all pointed out that if you don't live
it, you aren't it.

> >> I never said that I lived a Christian life.
> >
> >so you aren't really a christian then, huh?
> >
>
> The life that YOU set as a standard, no.
>
that the bible sets.

> I am Christian, I believe in God and don't kill, promote or support
> violence, and don't go after others for anything, offer help when I
> can.
>
those things are a start, but that's hardly all of it.

> You think that Christians should live in farms or just herd sheep,
> cannot fight back when attacked and shouldn't even do anything other
> than limiting themselves to their homes and church.
>
nope. if that's what you think i've been saying, you're way off base.

> You are mistaken and couldn't be more confused.
>
> In fact this is just a loser's MO, hanging anything someone says on
> his belief or affiliation, since there is nothing you can do, and you
> are so full of hate that you need to take it out somehow.
>
you keep talking about hate - cite where i've shown it.

> Your type is the real problem with this world.
>
really?

> You are fake and everything about you is a lie and fake.

prove i'm fake.

> You twist everything to your liking and think that the world revolves
> around you, and then want others to work based on your twisted
> standards that you somehow came up with, since you lack education and
> integrity needed for such things.
>
no - i'm only looking at your supposed standards for yourself.

> >> That's how you try to win arguments, by lying through your rotten
> >> teeth.
> >
> >i see contradiction is your modus operandi.
> >
>
> Obviously talking to your image in the mirror.
> Because that is an accurate description of your posts, added to the
> fact that they are also full of hate and confusion.
>
just keep saying it..

>
> >> I said that I am believer, but NEVER said that I lived my life like
> >> Christ did, nor even said that I am perfect.
> >
> >nobody's expecting you to be perfect.
>
> Then shut up, and quit whining.
>
true christianity != perfection. it also does != your behavior.
>
> >just to fit the label you've slapped on yourself.
>
> That is not a label, moron.
> That is reality and we have already established that you are reality
> challenged.
>
the reality you've demonstrated is not a true christian one.
>
> >> >> I never said that I am living in a Church, nor said that I am
> >> >> preacher, nor said that I am saint.
> >
> >> >well, the last point is kind of obvious.
> >
> >> Nice comeback, how does your foot taste in your mouth?
> >> Next time try not to lie your way through arguments.
> >
> >where am i lying?
> >
>
> What a loaded question.
> Where?
> Everywhere.
>
cite.

>
> So far you lied your way out of every point in two threads that I had
> the displeasure of seeing your retarded, ignorant, hate filling, lying
> posts in.
>
cite.
>
> >> >> I said that I am Christian.
> >> >and your attitude and actions bely that.
> >
> >> Not at all.
> >> You can be still a believer and have your own shortcomings.
> >
> >belief means living the life.
>
> ROFL.
>
> If you say so.
>
james - faith without works.
>
> Main Entry: be·lief
> Pronunciation: b&-'lEf
> Function: noun
> Etymology: Middle English beleave, probably alteration of Old English
> gelEafa, from ge-, associative prefix + lEafa; akin to Old English
> lyfan
> 1 : a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in
> some person or thing
> 2 : something believed; especially : a tenet or body of tenets held by
> a group
> 3 : conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some
> being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence
> synonyms BELIEF, FAITH, CREDENCE, CREDIT mean assent to the truth of
> something offered for acceptance. BELIEF may or may not imply
> certitude in the believer <my belief that I had caught all the
> errors>. FAITH almost always implies certitude even where there is no
> evidence or proof <an unshakable faith in God>. CREDENCE suggests
> intellectual assent without implying anything about grounds for assent
> <a theory now given credence by scientists>. CREDIT may imply assent
> on grounds other than direct proof <gave full credit to the statement
> of a reputable witness>. synonym see in addition OPINION
>
>
>
> Oops!
> You are not even sure about your own language.
>
the bible shows belief is demonstrated by works.
>
> >try looking up 1 tim. 3:5, about people
> >claiming to be godly but not living up to it.
>
>
> You are confused in that as well.
>
really?
>
> >> Unlike you, who claim to be the keeper of the truth and the keeper of
> >> who is vulgar and who is not, I never claimed that I am perfect.
> >
> >me neither.
>
> You actions imply that you are better than me, how do you explain your
> own crap then?

what are you talking about?

> It's simple, you are the hypocrite here, and you should go after
> yourself.
>

>
> >> When I get attacked I respond and fight back.
> >
> >i didn't attack you.
> >
>
> Denying it and lying about it doesn't make it disappear.
> You DID attack me.
>
nope.

> Going after someone because he said he is Christian, trying to
> discredit him, calling him a hypocrite IS attacking him.
>
don't have to discredit you - others can see what you are. calling
someone a hypocrite is not attacking when they aren't living up to
their own standards.

> Either you're stupid or trying hard to act like one.
>
>
> >> You want someone to sit there and watch you and your fellow retards
> >> attack him and if he didn't respond you'll dance "See I was right, you
> >> are all wrong a fake" and when he responds "See I was right, you are
> >> fake, you're not being peaceful and not a true Christian", and you'll
> >> always assume that you won.
> >
> >again, i didn't attack you.
> >
>
> Again.
>
> Going after someone because he said he is Christian, trying to
> discredit him, calling him a hypocrite IS attacking him.
>
nope.

> >> Well sorry to burst your bubble.
> >
> >none to burst.
> >
>
> If you say so.
>
>
> >> But I am not a negative person or a passive person who would take
> >> abuse and sit there.
> >
> >no,
>
> Yes.
>
>
>
> >you invent the idea you're being abused and react to it.
> >
>
> Really?
> So you're saying that I am imagining all this, nobody called me names,
> and you didn't start going after my posts?
>
i called you no names. i said your behavior was not consistent with
what you claimed to believe. if this is "going after"...

> Damn, you are worse than what you already proved that you are.
>
how?
>
>
> >> I fight back, as I see fit.
> >> If you can't handle that, then tough, and if you think that is not
> >> following Christianity, then you are even more stupid that what you
> >> already have shown to be.
> >
> >defending yourself is one thing.
>
> Which is exactly what is happening.
>
really?

> >doing it in a vulgar,
>
> More whining.
>
> I see vulgarity I respond with vulgarity.
>
didn't give you any.

> You should educate yourself a bit about it, instead of whining,
>
> See Exodus 21:15-35
>
this has no bearing whatsoever on this topic.
>
> >unchristian way
>
> Based on your history in this so far, you hardly qualify to understand
> what is Christianity and judge people's actions based on your
> confusion.
>
the bible is very clear on the type of speech christians would avoid.

> It is just like letting child play with a gun.
> You don't have the necessary skills, intelligence or even the required
> IQ to be allowed to judge people.
>
why? because i see your hypocricy?
>
> >is another entirely.
>
> Whatever you say.
>
>
> >> >> That made your hate radar immediately pick it, along with several
> >> >> similar retard here that have the same MO.
> >
> >> >the only thing i hate is people misrepresenting what jesus taught.
> >
> >
> >> Then should start hating yourself, since you are doing it all the way,
> >> hypocrite.
> >
> >how am i misrepresenting him?
> >
>
> You say that you believe in him, yet you don't "live a Christian
> life", what does that say about you?
>
prove that i don't "live a christian life".

> Other than being a hypocrite, of course.
>
my "hypocricy" is only expecting you to live up to your own standards.
>
>
> >> >> >> >regardless, it's obvious that your claimed beliefs are having no impact
> >> >> >> >in the way you live your life.
> >> >> >> So you are being able to tell how I live my life, from reading few
> >> >> >> words on your monitor?
> >> >> >i know jesus wouldn't use the language you do.
> >> >> I am not Jesus, I am human, I have my faults, but unlike you, I am not
> >> >> ashamed of saying what I think of others, nor blindly hate others.
> >> >> >i know he wouldn't constantly denigrate others like you do.
> >> >> I don't.
> >> >> Several people here would tell you that I am the most peaceful person
> >> >> around, but unfortunately, when peace and decency doesn't work with
> >> >> some, the only language they understand is fighting back.
> >> >so, it's okay to behave like everyone else when it doesn't suit you,
> >> >huh?
> >
> >> No moron, learn how to read.
> >
> >i did. that's basically what you said.
> >
>
> You still cannot read if your life depended on it.
>
i read perfectly fine. translate if you need to. i just summarized what
you said.

> >> >jesus didn't didn't do those things, no matter how difficult the
> >> >circumstances he was in.
> >
> >> 1. There was no usenet at that time.
> >
> >lol.
>
> I agree, it is laughable when you say that I am not Christian because
> I posted responding to flames on usenet.
>
> Glad that you came to your senses, at last.
>
no, i'm laughing at the notion that somehow different circumstances
than in the first century somehow mean different standards.
>
> >> 2. There is a reason that Christ is God.
> >
> >how did god die?
> >
>
> You are confused, and this proves, again, that you don't understand
> Christianity.
>
nonanswer. how did god die?

> >> I am human and if you think that all Christians are perfect then you
> >> prove, once again, that you are stupid.
> >
> >not perfect.
>
> That's what I said, dummy.
>
>
> >simply better than the lowest common denominator.
> >
>
> The lowest being you and your like?
>
i'm not using foul language or namecalling.
>
> I am certainly better than that.
>
i see no evidence.

> > >> Take yourself as an example.
> >> >> All I did, is posting that I am Christian, triggering your blind
> >> >> hatred, and following me around, trying to associate every word that I
> >> >> say with my belief, trying to take cheap shots at me just because you
> >> >> hate Christianity or Christians.
> >
> >> >i don't hate you.
> >
> >> That's a lie and you can't convince anyone of it, even yourself.
> >
> >well, if you wish to feel persecuted, that's your perogative. i don't
> >hate you -
>
> You keep saying that, while all you have posted so far is negative
> remarks, weird and pathetic assumptions about me, someone you have yet
> to meet or even know who he is, and trying your best to discredit me.
>
> That doesn't come out of liking, or love, you confused dummy.
>
i hate the way you do things. i don't hate you. if you can't see the
difference, you're the one who's confused.
>
> >just thing things you say sometimes.
> >
>
> What?
>
> Someone translate this to English for me.
>
"the things".
>
> >> >i definitely do not hate those who truly follow
> >> >jesus' teachings.
> >
> >> Yes you do.
> >> Your posts clearly showed it.
> >
> >where?
> >
>
> Go back and read your posts, you certainly seem to be living in
> denial.
>
cite.

>
> >> >but i hate people claiming to follow his teachings
> >> >but not actually doing it.
> >
> >> So you say, your actions prove you to be a liar.
> >
> >where have i lied?
> >
>
> Everywhere in your posts.
> Claiming that I asked others to covert to Christianity.
> Claiming that I said that I am living Christian life, or at least what
> you think that is Christian life.
>
being a christian means living the life. you can't have the label
without the action.

and i never said you were converting anyone.

> And the list goes on.
>
> >> >> You don't even know my real name, yet you ASSume that you know who I
> >> >> am, how do I live my life, and even have the nerve to call me a
> >> >> hypocrite because you imagined me forcing others to convert to
> >> >> Christianity.
> >> >and because of how you do not follow his teachings or example in a
> >> >public forum like this.
> >> Yeah, so if I was a peaceful person taking abuse but not responding
> >> would you be calling me a true Christian?
> >> Think again.
> >
> >i'd certianly find it easier to believe that you were.
> >
>
> Translation: You wouldn't.
>
nope.

> Thanks for admitting it.

nope.

> At least you managed to be honest for once.
>
huh?

> >> You'd be the first one dancing claiming victory saying that since I
> >> didn't respond, it means that others were right.
> >
> >no. i'd assume you were actually trying to put on a christian
> >personality.
>
>
> You are still confused.
>
nonanswer.

> >> >> Basically a typical hypocritical loser stereo type.
> >
> >> >like i said, if what we see here is indicative of how you behave in
> >> >public, i can only imagine how you are in private.
> >
> >> Which you show how clueless you are.
> >
> >> You don't like people judging you, or allegedly telling you how to
> >> live your live, what to believe in or what to do, yet you do it all
> >> time.
> >
> >you know about my views on judging how?
> >
>
> Good God!
> Look at your posts and stop being a dummy.
>
you ultimately answer, as i will, to our creator for your actions.
doesn't change the fact that there are standards, and they are spelled
out.

> >> A perfect example of how someone can be a hypocrite and liar.
> >
> >again, you know my views how?
> >
>
> See above.
>
> >> >> >i can only imagine the things
> >> >> >that you do in private, given this is a public forum.
> >> >> As usual you are wrong, but what else is new?
> >> >what are you doing to prove me wrong?
> >
> >> Why should I?
> >> The burden of proof is on the accuser, or did you already forget?
> >> You accuse others of not being something that they are, you are the
> >> one responsible to prove your allegation.
> >
> >your unchristian interactions with others here have proven what you
> >are.
> >
>
> Proven what?
> Proven that you and your likes are confused, prejudiced, retarded,
> lying, and full of hate.
> That's what they have proven.
>
if you say so...lol...

> >> You tried, in a pitiful way proving it and you failed.
> >> Case closed.
> >
> >in your mind, yes.
>
> In reality actually.
>
> >so why don't you just drop it then, if it should be
> >so self-evident that i've lost?
>
> Going by this flawed and retarded argument coming from a retard like
> you, then you feel that you still didn't win, that is why you keep
> obsessively/compulsively replying to my pots and don't drop it.
>
no - i just wonder why you feel a need to defend yourself.

> What's the matter, still obsessed with having the last word on this?
> You never cease to prove me right.
>
really? i haven't seen one right thing yet from you.
>
> >> >> You are also a retard, full of hate, and it is showing.
> >> >only for those who claim to follow jesus' teachings but don't - and not
> >> >for them, but for their actions.
> >
> >> That's a nice mask you have, but doesn't work.
> >> Hate is in you, and no matter how you lie about it, you are full of
> >> hate.
> >
> >prove it.
>
> So I have to prove everything that I say, but that doesn't apply on
> you, right?
>
hey - you're the one who set the standard.

> You can just go on insulting, throwing names and assumptions,
> theories, and no one has the right to question all that.
>
> What a moron you are.
>
> >where have i said i hated you?
> >
>
> You actions clearly show it.
> You don't have to say some of the things, you actions speak for
> themselves.
>
really? prove it.

>
> >> >> >> ROFLMAO!!!
> >> >> >> You are not a smart person and it is showing.
> >> >> >more christianity coming out in you,
> >> >> That has nothing to do with my religion or anyone else's.
> >> >if you don't think it does,
> >> Not think I know for fact it doesn't, but you're as confused as ever.
> >
> >really?
>
> Yes really.
>
> >what about james saying that faith is dead without works? what
> >works are you exhibiting to prove your faith?
>
> I don't have to prove that I believe to you or to anyone.

nonanswer.

> God knows it, and my only proof is that I don't harm others.
>
there's far more to it than that. and as far as not harming others -
how do you feel your behavior here is not harming others?

> You don't like that and would like to take things out of context and
> use them for your malicious and mischievous purposes?
> That's your problem not mine.
>
>
> >> >then you don't understand what it's about.
> >
> >> Said someone who didn't understand Christianity's concept.
> >
> >prove it. what is the concept, then?
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>
> If you even ask someone to "Prove" what is Christianity then you are
> fake, and lied when you said that you believe in Christ and are
> Christian.
>
i didn't ask you to prove christianity. i asked you to prove that you
understand what it means, in the way you live your life.

> There is no "proof", there was at that time when it happened, but now
> it is based on faith and believing.
> But don't let your confusion stand in the way.
>
>
proof is in the way you live your life.

> >and how are you living that
> >concept in your life?
> >
>
> My life non of your business or concern.
>
well, what i see here tells me plenty.

> >> >> >i see.
> >> >> The only thing that you see is hate, and I can understand why.
> >> >> >can't win the argument, so attack the person making it.
> >> >> Agreed!
> >
> >> >> Look at your posts.
> >> >> You couldn't win any argument with me so far, therefore attack me
> >> >> personally, call me a hypocrite, and call me not a true Christian.
> >
> >> >i haven't lost an argument with you,
> >
> >> Denial sure helps, but is not telling the truth.
> >
> >lol.
>
> Glad you agree.
>
>
> >> >despite what you claim.
> >
> >> I don't claim that, I know that for fact, but we already established
> >> that you are in denial.
> >
> >> >but just
> >> >keep saying it if it makes you feel better.
> >
> >
> >> Like you are doing now?
> >> Sure.
> >
> >
> >> >> Funny, you whine about being "attacked" while all you did so far is
> >> >> attacking me personally.
> >
> >
> >> >i said your actions were hypocritical.
> >
> >
> >> That is an attack, if you are confused about that, ask some adult to
> >> explain it to you.
> >
> >
> >
> >if this is an attack, man oh man...
> >
>
>
> Yeah, when get caught being a hypocrite yourself, it is always someone
> else's fault.
>
what is hypocritical about anything i've said?

> Yes, retarded moron, it is an attack on someone when you call him a
> hypocrite, added to the fact that you were wrong too.
>
prove me wrong.
> >
> >> >i'm not calling you a "retard"
> >> >or a bunch of vile names. how is what i'm doing attacking?
> >
> >> That is attacking.
> >> And if you don't like being called a retard, then stop acting like
> >> one.
> >
> >
> >
> >so, telling someone that their course of conduct is not consistent with
> >
> >their claimed beliefs is an attack?
> >
>
> Yes, because it is not true.
>
really? you think all those early christians would act like you?
>
> >> >> If you look up the word hypocrite, I am sure that you'd see something
> >> >> referring to yourself in the dictionary.
> >
> >> >again, just keep saying it if it makes you feel better.
> >
> >
> >> Truth hurts.
> >
> >
> >> >> >> "claimed beliefs"?
> >
> >
> >> >> >yup. you claim to believe in jesus,
> >
> >
> >> >> I don't claim, I know that for a fact.
> >
> >
> >> >> >but you act nothing like him.
> >
> >
> >> >> I am not Jesus, you are confused, I am human, and humans are not
> >> >> perfect.
> >
> >
> >> >you could certainly do far better if you truly believed it.
> >
> >
> >> Far better according to your own set self imposed standards?
> >> Nice try, but you are barking at the wrong tree.
> >
> >
> >
> >so you know better?
>
> Definitely.
>
really? prove it.

> >what are you doing in your life to prove your
> >beliefs?
> >
>
> There is nothing to be done.
> Follow what Christ and God said, the Ten Commandments, try to live
> peacefully, love your family and each other, help when you can, turn
> the other cheek whenever possible, but when that fails, I respond, and
> if you don't like that, that is YOUR problem.
>
so, you keep the sabbath? you don't covet? you show love for your
fellowman? i certainly don't see much evidence of the last point.

> So since you claimed that you are a true believer in Christ and
> Christianity, what are YOU doing to prove your beliefs?

well, let's see - strict neutrality in governmental affairs. i will not
kill my fellowman, whether here in the u.s. or halfway across the
world. telling others about what i've learned form the bible. avoiding
sexual immorality. keeping my speech and conduct clean. you know -
actual *works* demonstrating my beliefs.

> Going after Christians trying to discredit them is hardly a "Christian
> life" even by your own twisted standards.
>
you discredit yourself. you don't like me pointing it out.
>
> >> I would have considered a request like that seriously if it came from
> >> reliable, credible and a decent person, but from a hypocrite and liar,
> >> sorry you don't even count.
> >
> >lying?
>
> Yes.
>
> >hypocricy?
>
> Yes.
>
> >where on my part?
>
>
> Everywhere in your posts.
>
cite.
> >> >> >> So you're telling me that I have a different belief?
> >> >> >a person lives by what they truly believe in.
> >> >> >> This is why your type is never respected or taken seriously, EVER.
> >> >> >by whom?
> >> >> By any reasonable person.
> >> >> That definitely excludes most of the people here, and yourself
> >> >> included.
> >> >i don't see anyone but you attacking me.
> >> Could have fooled me.
> >> I am not attacking you, junior.
> >
> >nice try.
> >
>
> Indeed.
> You deny attacking others, now you say that I am attacking you?
>
yup.

> Let me get this straight, so when you start following up my posts
> trying to tell others that I am something that I am not, and trying
> your best to discredit me, that means that I attacked you?
>
saying that your actions bely your beliefs is not attacking you.

> What are you, a retarded politician?
> For Goodness sake, read your posts.
>
i suggest you do the same.
>
>
> >> Go back in the thread and see who started attacking the other.
> >> Tell you what, how about getting a clue while you are at it?
> >> Look back in the "Onward Christian Solders" thread and see who was
> >> attacking whom there too.
> >
> >
> >you, attacking me. very clearly.
> >
> >
>
> In your dreams.
> I am responding to YOUR attacks,
>
> You were not sitting somewhere minding your business and that picked
> you out of the millions on usenet to respond to your posts.
>
> Remember, moron, you started replying to my posts and calling me
> names.
>
what names? i said your actions were hypocritical.
>
> >> Now you are going to whine and cry, all those fake tears claiming to
> >> be victim?
> >
> >> Come on, even you know that it is nothing but nonsense.
> >
> >lol.
> >
>
> Glad you agree.
>
you infer this how?
> >
> >> >> >hypocrites?
> >
> >> >> No, I didn't say your likes.
> >
> >
> >> >speaking of deflecting the argument...
> >
> >
> >> Whatever makes you happy.
> >
> >
> >> You are a hypocrite, get used to be called like that until you get
> >> your act together.
> >
> >you need to take your own advice.
> >
>
>
> Yeah, coming from a proven hypocrite, that's not even credible.
>
nothing hypocritical about anything i've said. you're being evaluated
on your own claimed standards, not mine.
>
> >> >> >> You saw someone saying that he is a Christian, and immediately your
> >> >> >> mission in life became discrediting and attacking him.
> >
> >> >> >because
> >
> >> >> Glad you admit it.
> >
> >> >> >you're saying one thing and doing another.
> >
> >> >> I didn't say anything, moron.
> >
> >> >you're *saying* you're a christian.
> >
> >> Yes.
> >> You got that part right.
> >
> >> >you're behaving like you aren't.
> >
> >> According to you, with your twisted, and unrealistic view of the world
> >> from your hate glasses that set standards only God knows why they were
> >> there in the first place.
> >
> >so, you're so sure you know better?
>
> Yes.
>
prove it.

> >i see nothing to differentiate you
> >from "heathens".
>
> Then you're blind or stupid.
> Either way, you are not a person that I would take an advice from.
>
> You have yet to understand Christianity.
>
really? whose behaving more like christ here?
>
> >> >> >> You are a sad and a pathetic person.
> >> >> >well, if that's your opinion of me, i'm fine with that. believe me,
> >> >> It is, and that reflects the truth.
> >> >you stand compltely alone in that assessment
> >> Living in denial doesn't count.
> >> Imaginary friends also don't count.
> >
> >don't have any imaginary friends in usenet.
>
> You obviously trying to make some.
>
prove it. with a cite.

> >don't claim to have any
> >friends, period, in usenet.
>
> Which explains why are you trying to make some, by slurping.
>
>
> >i prefer people in real life.
>
> That doesn't look like a possibility for you, given your confusion
> about basics of life, and attitude problems, and the amount of time
> and energy you spend picking up fights and trying to discredit others
> that you have yet to meet.
>
well, you can believe that if it makes you feel better.
>
>
> >> >> >your judgements about living and other people are skewed enough
> >
> >
> >> >> ROFL.
> >
> >
> >> >> My God, and you say that you are not full of hate?
> >> >> Just knowing that I am Christian that immediately brought out all this
> >> >> hate from you towards someone that you are totally clueless who he is
> >> >> and what he thinks or even know his name.
> >
> >> >like i said, i have nothing but respect and love for what jesus taught.
> >
> >> Which is a lie.
> >
> >prove it's a lie.
> >
>
> I'll repeat what I posted earlier about this obsessive compulsive
> whining of yours.
>
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
worded nothing like that.

> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>
like repeating yourself like you?
>
> Read your posts for the proof.
>
cite.
>
>
>
> >> All you have done so far is trying to prove it didn't happen and go
> >> after anyone who says that he believes that.
> >
> >> >you aren't demonstrating those qualities.
> >
> >> According to you, seeing the world through your hate glasses.
> >
> >through the qualities that jesus said his followers would exhibit.
> >
>
> So Jesus said that we can't post on usenet?
> ROFL.
> You are confused.
>
would jesus behave as you when doing it?
>
> >> You don't count, and your word for it is not even considered serious,
> >> if you have failed to grasp that fact so far.
> >
> >so, if i don't count,
>
> There is no if about it.
> You don't count.
>
> >why continue to feel the need to defend yourself?
>
> I am not, I am just responding, but not for too long.
>
funny, you claim i'm attacking you, you state above you're defending
yourself, now you say you aren't. what is it, then?

> Wait a second, going by this logic, if "Dewey" was not all those
> people that I prove that he was, then "why continue to feel the need
> to defend" himself?
>
> Oops!
> You didn't see this coming.
>
i don't care. i wasn't defending dewey. i was talking about *you*
>
>
> >> >> The fact that you consider someone bad or his " judgements about
> >> >> living and other people are skewed" just because you just learned that
> >> >> he is Christian.
> >
> >> >no,
> >
> >> Yes, but you are in denial.
> >
> >prove it.
> >
>
> I'll repeat what I posted earlier about this obsessive compulsive
> whining of yours.
>
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>
>
> Read your posts for the proof.
>
>
> >> >because he claims to be one but doesn't act like it.
> >
> >> You keep whining about this, but fail to even convince yourself.
> >
> >prove it.
> >
>
> I'll repeat what I posted earlier about this obsessive compulsive
> whining of yours.
>
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>

like repeating the same nontruth over and over like you?
>
> Read your posts for the proof.
>
cite.
>
>
> >> >> And you say that you are not a sad or pathetic person?
> >> >> I sure hope that you don't serve on a jury one day, being so
> >> >> prejudiced like this, I am sure that you would recommend a death
> >> >> penalty to the accused if you learned that he believes in God,
> >> >> regardless of any facts.
> >
> >> >no, i believe fully in the god of the bible.
> >
> >> Your actions clearly show otherwise.
> >
> >how?
>
> Oh dear, where to start?
>
> Let's see.
> You go after someone because you think that since he didn't turn the
> other cheek and "not living the Christian life" or the life that your
> twisted mind imagines, then he is not a true believer and is only
> "wearing a label", but when you do the same, engage in hostility, call
> names,

not true.

> lie,

not true.

> and do even worse,

not true.

> it is OK, and you're not a hypocrite
> and you are the true believer and others should take your word that
> you "fully in the god of the bible", which you are so confused about
> and can't even post his name properly.
>
> Nice try, but better luck in the future, I am sure someone will buy
> your nonsense.
>
i'm not asking anyone to buy anything. i'm asking you to take a look at
yourself.
>
> >> >i have a real problem with
> >> >people who claim to but don't live by his son's teachings.
> >
> >> Then you should have problems with yourself.
> >
> >why?
>
> See above.
>
nonanswer.
>
> >> >> Unfortunately, society today has lots of scum bags like you, arrogant,
> >> >> hypocritical, self imposed authority to be the keeper of who is good
> >> >> and who is bad, and the self declared of in depth knowledge of others
> >> >> without even meeting them or knowing them.
> >
> >
> >> >i've seen plenty of evidence of the (lack of) impact of true christian
> >> >principles in your life in your behavior here.
> >
> >> ROFLMAO.
> >
> >> So you have figured out my life from reading few posts in your short
> >> trolling spree here?
> >
> >reading several posts.
> >
>
> ROFLMAO.
> Are you for real?
> I can't imagine someone this stupid and so much delusional like this.
>
like the ones you made to prof. jonez.

> >> Yeah, I believe you now.
> >
> >> I should end my life because a retard like you doesn't like me.
> >
> >i wouldn't wish that on anyone.
>
> You obviously missed the humor in it, but what else is new?

nope. just pointing out that i wish you no ill, in spite of what you
might like to believe.

> You cannot read, you are confused, and lie through your rotten teeth.

prove it.

> Get a life.
>
>
> >> >> >that i can't really care.
> >
> >> >> You seem to care enough to follow me around, trying to discredit
> >> >> anything that I say.
> >
> >
> >> >uh, no,
> >
> >
> >> Uh, yes.
> >
> >
> >> >just your most obvious specious claimms
> >
> >
> >> If you say so.
> >> You are living in denial.
> >
> >
> >
> >how?
> >
>
>
> See few lines above this.
>
cite.

> >
> >> Hate is filling your head, and your heart (I doubt at this point that
> >> you have a heart), and is getting you to act like this.
> >
> >prove it.
> >
>
>
>
>
> I'll repeat what I posted earlier about this obsessive compulsive
> whining of yours.
>
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>
>
> Read your posts for the proof.
>
cite.
>
>
> >> >> I'd say not only you care, but you get worked up reading my posts and
> >> >> opinions.
> >
> >> >really?
> >
> >> Yes really.
> >
> >> >am i using foul language?
> >
> >> You don't have to use foul language to be obsessed with my posts and
> >> get worked up reading them.
> >
> >prove that i'm getting worked up.
> >
>
>
> I'll repeat what I posted earlier about this obsessive compulsive
> whining of yours.
>
>
> That's all you could manage to whine so far.
>
> "Prove it"
> "You are un Christian"
> "You are vulgar"
> "Whah! Whah! Whah!"
>
> You can't even engage in discussions like an adult or in an
> intelligent manner.
>
>
> Read your posts for the proof.
>
repeating the same nontruth doesn't make it true.
>
> >> >am i insulting you personally?
> >
> >> Yes.
> >> Read your posts, dummy.
> >
> >
> >
> >so, you claim to believe in an established standard of right and wrong,
> >but don't live by it, and get mad when someone points that out? that's
> >being insulted to you?
> >
>
> What?
> You are getting confused again.
>
> I said that you are insulting me personally.
>
where have i done that?

> There was no mention of "an established standard of right and wrong"
> you retarded moron.
>
> And yes, when I see someone calling me names and accusing me of doing
> things that I have never done,

but you *have* behaved in a manner inconsistent with true christianity
- here.

> twisting facts,

twisting what facts? you haven't proven me wrong i a single thing. all
you've done is repeat ad nauseum that i'm confused. you haven't shown
where, once.

> that's an insult,
> jackass.
>
really. so i guess you can feel free to not live by the standards you
claim, and no one should have the right to say otherwise.
>
> >> >sounds
> >> >like you're describing yourself.
> >
> >> In your dreams.
> >> But in reality, I described you.
> >
> >nope.
>
> Denying it won't change it.
>
saying it over and over won't make it true, either.
>
> >i feel calm and fine, thank you. it's a beautiful day outside,
> >work is going well,
>
>
> Good for you.
>
>
> >and a usenet discussion is hardly a reason to get
> >upset.
>
> I don't know about you, but someone who jumps in the middle of a
> discussion that was not even mentioning him, turns away from the
> topic, and then posts a 700+ lines of insults, lies, twisting,
> whining, and name calling is hardly "feel calm and fine" nor not being
> upset, despite how much he claims that he is not.
>
sort of like you when i posted here the first time. and you can try to
infer all those things from me, but you can't prove it.
>
> Now if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do, rather than
> replying to and educating a confused, retarded, lying moron like you
> who is full of hate like you.
>
> Get a life, and consider getting some facts before you open your mouth
> instead of lying through your rotten teeth.

i have facts. aside from insults, you've done nothing to prove me wrong.

.