Re: This ***'s Pathetique

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:37:17 GMT, <bryguy58@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Sports Fan wrote:

>>>>> You use that filthy mouth on Sports Fan's ***,
>>>>> pig***?
>>>>> I doubt he'd let a Road Runner whore like you anywhere
>>>>> near him.
>>>> They are one and the same.
>>>
>>> Let's keep pretending. It's more entertaining that way.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Didn't you mention something about being mindfucked?
>
>You don't get it. It's not about you. It's the
>spectacle of group fun that is of interest. Right now most
>here are dumbfounded at your tomfoolery and taking
>light whacks at your hide. Nobody really cares, man.

Sure they do.

Whoever took such cheap shots is certainly interested and certainly
cares.

As for what you call tomfoolery, in the decent non moron filled world
is called facts.


>> Then how come you conveniently ignore the fact that you
>> and "Dewey" have not posted anything other than taking
>> shots at me in the last 72 hours?
>
>Oh please. Get over yourself. I've hardly taken a shot.

So you are saying that you were not the one who posted those 2
messages accusing me of being "mindfucked" and that I should look in
the mirror, and now the implied accusation that I am using sock
puppets?

Must be your twin brother or your alter ego.


>> For that matter, unlike your precious friend, I have
>> higher standards than resorting to use sock puppets,
>> that's lowest of the low, to quote 'Dewey", and only
>> lifeless person would try to convince others that his
>> sock puppets are several different people.
>
>Standards re: the use of sock puppets?

So you can't read either?

I consider using sock puppets as a lowest form of kook play on usenet.
It generally reflects your disturbed behavior and how you act even in
real life.


>Who gives a ***?

Obviously you and your type.
You keep saying that you don't give a *** and yet post and reply to
posts regarding that subject and others., just like the rest.


>My life and perspective on usenet is much bigger.

Could have fooled me.

>Grow a life.

I have a life, and certainly is much better than most of the readers
here, or at least the ones who "don't care" enough to post tons of
incoherent ramblings on how they are the elite of the human kind and
the rest should bow to their self declared authority.


>Right now all you are doing is providing S. Knight with
>mountains of material for parody.

So what?
Why would I care if someone wants to post a parody on anything that I
post.

The fact remains, this newsgroups is full of self declared experts,
self proclaimed geniuses, loons and unstable persons, yourself
included hiding behind that "I know it all but I am too good for you"
mask.



>> But I doubt that you are honest or mature enough to
>> acknowledge all those facts.
>
>You are patently silly.


According to you, when you don't like the truth.

>One day you may reflect on this
>chapter of your life with a crimson tinge of self-embarrasment.

Why would I be embarrassed?
Posting facts hardly makes me embarrassed with that.

Too bad for you and your type that I am not an ass kisser nor a loony
like the circle of jerks that you have formed.


>I hope so. It will mean you've grown. Good luck.

Does that mean that you went through the same thing?
You seem to speak from experience.

But I doubt that you have grown up, otherwise you wouldn't act like
that teenager.
.

Quantcast