Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: Thermos <cfbltw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:25:11 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 30, 3:21 pm, David Cronk <cr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom K wrote:
He is certainly not a replacement. He no longer has the skills to be an
everyday player. However, he would make a fine utility infielder, IMHO.
And he has pitched an inning ;-)
What is Betemit going to be, then? Unless there is a plan to have Betemit
play a lot of first base....though I haven't heard anything about Betemit
playing first in any fall or winter leagues.
I forgot about Betemit. Still, I stand by the idea that Loretta is no
everyday player, but well qualified as a utility infielder. I don't
think there is any chance the Yankees are looking at him as an everyday
second baseman. Though, you are right, I don't see the need with
Betemit on the team.
But you missed the most important part. He has pitched an inning. We
need middle relief.
We need a lefty.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: David Cronk
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- References:
- Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: David Cronk
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: Zoolander
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: Thermos
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: David Cronk
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: Tom K
- Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- From: David Cronk
- Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- Prev by Date: Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- Next by Date: Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- Previous by thread: Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- Next by thread: Re: Those ESPN.com guys are on the ball
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|