Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: Thermos <cfbltw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:50:40 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 30, 6:49 am, "HPLeft" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"BadgerBC" <neilrichardson3...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1f11aa7e-8a66-4e79-ad1c-928a85f4e68e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If this rumor is true, then I think the price of Santana is too steep
for them to consider a trade. They might as well hope for the best
and wait until after 2008.
Agree. Pass. At the very worst, the Yankees have, what, four potential
young stud starters (Hughes, Chamberlain, Horne, Kennedy) plus a bunch of
other pitching prospects, plus Wang, plus Mussina (to help hold fort for
another season) and maybe Andy. And if they find the need a veteran the end
of spring training, they can probably find one in exchange for one or two of
the middle level guys.
I do wonder how Wang's going to feel about Posada catching him after Jorge
opened his mouth?
I had the same thought. Given what I've read about him, I don't think
Wang will be insulted. Still, a really dumb thing for Jorge to say.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - We Are The Champions
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- References:
- Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: BadgerBC
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: HPLeft
- Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Prev by Date: Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Next by Date: Re: Latest on Santana from twincities.com
- Previous by thread: Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Next by thread: Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Index(es):