Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: "Bwana Jim" <nc757aa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:05:49 GMT
"HPLeft" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:yMS3j.5$Ek2.4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
end
"BadgerBC" <neilrichardson3819@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1f11aa7e-8a66-4e79-ad1c-928a85f4e68e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If this rumor is true, then I think the price of Santana is too steep
for them to consider a trade. They might as well hope for the best
and wait until after 2008.
Agree. Pass. At the very worst, the Yankees have, what, four potential
young stud starters (Hughes, Chamberlain, Horne, Kennedy) plus a bunch of
other pitching prospects, plus Wang, plus Mussina (to help hold fort for
another season) and maybe Andy. And if they find the need a veteran the
of spring training, they can probably find one in exchange for one or twoof
the middle level guys.bleak performance in the playoffs I doubt he will be very upset with what
I do wonder how Wang's going to feel about Posada catching him after Jorge
opened his mouth?
Matt C
I think Wang may prefer to be a low key member of the rotation. After his
Posada said. Wang is a real good pitcher that fits in, but he is not an ace.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - We Are The Champions
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- References:
- Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: BadgerBC
- Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- From: HPLeft
- Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Prev by Date: Re: Janks Trade Entire Farm System For One Player
- Next by Date: Re: Might have to give Hughes and Kennedy....
- Previous by thread: Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Next by thread: Re: Price: To get Santana, Yanks would lose an impact player
- Index(es):