Re: Beam LOL!
- From: "warriorsforever" <muwarriorsfan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jul 2006 06:22:57 -0700
Pepe Papon wrote:
On 4 Jul 2006 18:01:09 -0700, "warriorsforever"
<muwarriorsfan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Pepe Papon wrote:
On 4 Jul 2006 17:00:13 -0700, "warriorsforever"
<muwarriorsfan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yep, I can see why everyone was so enthused.
Well, I hope that ends the fascination with Beam and Bean and anyone
else from the Yanks pathetic farm system.
Of course. It's always wise to give up on a rookie after one bad
outing.
You're right. Beam was pretty good Sunday night...the HR he gave up
then didn't go quite as far as tonight's bombs.
He's a keeper, alright!
It's probably a waste of time to point out to you that he had a pretty
decent ERA prior to today's game.
His ERA was around 4.50 prior to yesterday's debacle. And he had given
up more hits than innings pitched (8 hits in 6 innings, iirc). That's
hardly promising or positive or brimming with potential. And when he
gives up hits, they're rockets. Doesn't look too different from
Proctor, actually.
Now Smith has actually looked somewhat hard to hit. His control has
been lousy, though.
--
~ Seth Jackson
MySpace URL - http://www.myspace.com/sethjacksonsong
Songwriting and Music Business Info: http://www.sethjackson.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beam LOL!
- From: Pepe Papon
- Re: Beam LOL!
- References:
- Beam LOL!
- From: warriorsforever
- Re: Beam LOL!
- From: Pepe Papon
- Re: Beam LOL!
- From: warriorsforever
- Re: Beam LOL!
- From: Pepe Papon
- Beam LOL!
- Prev by Date: Re: Brilliant Torre Quote
- Next by Date: Re: Yankee Radio no longer on web?
- Previous by thread: Re: Beam LOL!
- Next by thread: Re: Beam LOL!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|