Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Seth Jackson <a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:29:55 GMT
On 31 May 2006 10:12:30 -0700, "Joe F." <JFelice@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thermos wrote:
Long Rod Penetrator wrote:
Soon2Be27WS....(maybe) wrote:
It's should "have", not should "of".
Or, as spoken, "should've."
I'm not the Grammar Police (which isn't to say I shouldn't be, 'cause
I'd rock at it), but "should of"? Twice?
Actually, the initial post said "should of sign Carlos Beltran". That
is one savage mauling of the language.
The Yankees should of sign Bob Gibson and Ted Williams...
Beltran no hit much better than Bernie last year, he who sucked it.
but yankys sined jonnie damon hes beter then belltran
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: 2006 Yankees
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- References:
- Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Timothy White
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Soon2Be27WS....\(maybe\)
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Long Rod Penetrator
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Thermos
- Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- From: Joe F.
- Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- Prev by Date: Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- Next by Date: Re: Stinnett another hit with a runner on
- Previous by thread: Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- Next by thread: Re: Should of sign Carlos Beltran...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|