Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: "BadgerBC" <neilrichardson3819@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2006 07:56:52 -0800
Erasmus "The Mannequin" Brown wrote:
"BadgerBC" <neilrichardson3819@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143770971.653152.251550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:
: GaryFL wrote:
: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:47:35 -0500, "Jim Tiberio"
: > <jimtiberio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >
:
: > >She claims she still took the day care money because she quit her job
to
: > >hang out with her daughter after school. I guess getting knocked up by
a
: > >pro athlete entitles one to no longer work.
: > >
: >
: > He wasn't a famous athlete in 1989 and he had no money then. He was
: > just a dumb, goofy looking young kid.
:
: Back then I wouldn't be surprised if she was making more money than
: Randy as she had been working at Lawrence Livermore. She was four
: years older than Randy. He was 24 and she was 29 and had just gotten
: pregnant (I think they broke up halfway through pregnancy). I wouldn't
: be surprised if the breakup was due to the marriage question. She
: didn't even ask for child support for the first nine years.
:
Hmm, what was she doing at Lawrence Livermore? SDI?
No idea. It could've just been an admin job.
.
- References:
- Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: Double-Aces
- Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: Jim Tiberio
- Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: GaryFL
- Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: BadgerBC
- Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- From: Erasmus \"The Mannequin\" Brown
- Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- Prev by Date: Dowd: Bad call by MLB
- Next by Date: Re: Dowd: Bad call by MLB
- Previous by thread: Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- Next by thread: Re: Johnson is right. Why is a 16 year old
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|