Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal



In article <449crjF11j2vU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kcyanks1@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
> The Cat wrote:
> > In article <FJADf.706$C11.92@xxxxxxxx>, eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> >> Who cares about since it opened - Jacobs was a different place, with
> >> exuberant sellouts every day the first few years. Crisp wasn't playing
> >> under those conditions. Since those days attendance went way down - that
> >> in itself can affect the nature of play. And as far as pitching and
> >> hitting talent, you do know park factor calculations are based on
> >> road/home differentials that correct for that sort of thing, right?
> >>
> >>
> >> The explain the park factor in some rational way.
> >>
> >> And then there is the reverse factor. Damon was significantly less
> >> productive outside Fenway.
> >>
> >
> > Sure, ok. From 2002-2004, their team OPS went in the tank. It finally
> > started to rebound in 2005, but their league leading pitching kept the
> > park factor numbers depressed.
> >
> > Now lets compare that to your "smaller crowd" theory, hmmm?
> >
>
> I have no clue about the validity of his smaller crowd theory, but your
> theory about the Indians' team OPS going down mistakes how park factors
> are calculated. They do not vary based on how good the home team is.
>

Wait wait, their offense certainly is in the equation for determining
Park Factor. Look at the numbers. In the first 8 years since Jacobs
opened, it was considered a hitter's park (according to Park Factor).
The Indians averaged over 5 1/2 runs a game. In the 4 years since then,
they averaged over 4 1/2 runs per game. In those 4 years, it went to
being a pitcher's park (according to Park Factor). The dimensions of the
field did not change. Their offense clearly did.

--
The Cat
"I got cat class and I got cat style"
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
    ... > The explain the park factor in some rational way. ... their team OPS went in the tank. ... but their league leading pitching kept the ... "I got cat class and I got cat style" ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: More purrs for Cleo please
    ... Try another article saying that you are sure someone rescued your cat ... Yesterday after work I stopped by the park to ... just in case Sammy still shows up there. ... well-meaning soul who maybe hasn't seen the flyers. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: Just released American Secret
    ... In order to spy on Soviet diplomats sitting in the park across the street ... Unfortunately the cat was killed when run over by a taxi crossing the ...
    (rec.aviation.military)
  • Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
    ... Do they definitely even correlate ... > strongly with the Indians' offense on a year-to-year basis? ... (I realize> year-to-year park factors are often not used because they lack much> data, but I just want to make sure there even is such a correlation that> makes asking the question we are asking necessary). ... The Cat "I got cat class and I got cat style". ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal
    ... > I could have done something totally wrong, but based on my analysis> above, if we assume that the park did not change at all, then any> improvement or decline in team offense would not affect PF. ... > Wikipedia does say 'While some variation in the can be attributable to> fluctuations in offensive and defesivce performance, PF accounts for the> production of both teams in each park and, correspondingly, is very> useful in determining which actual ballparks are "hitter friendly" and> which are "pitcher friendly".' ... We know the field dimensions didn't change, so you have to attribute it to on the field performance. ... The Cat "I got cat class and I got cat style". ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)