Re: Lupica: Crisp and Damon are equal

In article <8ucDf.566$Bn1.278@xxxxxxxx>, eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:21:12 -0500, The Cat wrote:
>
> > In article <7WaDf.1969$g47.1863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > jclayton23NOSPAM!!!!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Compare Damon's away splits to Crisp's. It isn't even close. Crisp had
> >> > more BB than Damon and a higher OBP on the road.
> >> >
> >> > Damon benefitted hugely from Fenway while Crisp was hurt by Jacob's.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, but like I said, it would be expected that Crisp is better
> >> offensively, since its basically comparing a LF to a CF.
> >>
> >
> > A player actually hurt by Jacobs Field? Oooh, I've got to see this...
>
> Look and learn.
>
> http://www.sportfanatics.net/Baseball/Fantasy%20Baseball/2005/2005_Baseball_Stadium_Statistics.htm
>

Yeah, lets take a look at those numbers since it opened, hmmm? And then
lets cross refernce the hitting and pitching talent in those respective
years.

Have you actually ever been to Jacobs Field? Watched a game there? I go
every year.

Hey, we can play stathead all day long here. Coco hit better on the road
last year than at home, but did the opposite in 2004. Coco also has a
whopping .470 OPS in Fenway park, his third worst (Toronto and
Arlington). And I LOVE that .681 OPS from the leadoff spot, too.

Fenway certainly is a hitters park, but you aren't kidding anyone trying
to make out Jacobs as some picthers' paradise.

--
The Cat
"I got cat class and I got cat style"
.

Quantcast